-
Ducksworth ●
- 5 stars Rating: 92
9589 votes total - Wolverine247 Moderator
- (16166)
- 26 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
y2kMgrad ●
- 4 stars Rating: 72
13826 votes total - Budget Nudist
- (8827)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
TAMUWolverine ●
- 5 stars Rating: 88
4724 votes total - (20931)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
CorchBlue
- 5 stars Rating: 89
4860 votes total - King Wolverine247 Mod
- (14232)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
victorsclub ●
- 5 stars Rating: 87
947 votes total - (2309)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
vcmarsh1 said...
I've seen this debated on other boards, but not yet here. I went back a few pages and didn't see anything but didn't even know how to start searching the whole forum.
In an argument on Facebook with an osu fan now. He says:
' I have 0 problem with college athletes selling their own merchandise or awards they earned for money, tattoos, or whatever else they want. That's wrong because the ncaa says so? They are 'student athletes'? The ncaa is a non-profit organization yet makes billions of dollars off television contracts? They are a walking contradiction and have 0 credibility. So yes, I have absolutely no problem with what went down. Had Tressel been upfront about it, the players would have been suspended and that would have been the end if it. That is why the program got in trouble. The ncaa is a sham. At any rate, we have to sit out a bowl game this year but reload the roster. Works for me. Good luck rest of the conference in 2013 and beyond.'
Followed with: 'Oh, and I'm pretty sure Auburn fan had no problem buying a national championship, SEC fan playing with rosters full of kids who got into school because the admissions department bends the rules, and USC fan for sitting out 2 years and now being preseason #1.'
First of all, it's disgusting that a fan would happily compare his program to the 2010 Auburn Tigers.
But before all of this, he said that he'll happily take a 1 year bowl ban and slight sanctions in exchange for the run osu has had going back to 2002.
So I ask, would you take several B1G Championships, a national title, and an 8-1 record against osu in exchange for a 1 year bowl ban at some point and a reduction in scholarships?
-
MichaelHardenII
- 5 stars Rating: 92
3151 votes total - (3476)
- 18 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
CMXI said...
Hell no. A man has two things in this world, his word and his balls, and he shouldn't break either of them for anyone.
The luster of championships fades, but the stink of illicit behavior and an utter lack of integrity follow a program around. I think one of the things that Michigan can hang its hat on is that there has never, EVER been a HINT of recruiting impropriety. If anything, we've been victimized by such impropriety (Goodbye, Sammy Watkins).
I'd rather win the right way, or not at all. I value Michigan as a gold standard for the way an organization should carry and conduct itself - there's a reason no other school has the famous standard of "a Michigan Man." The university and this football program have been built on generations of high-character, high-quality young men, and I wouldn't trade 10 years of success for a black mark on that record in a million years.
The day Michigan stoops to Ohio State's level is the day I stop proudly wearing the Maize and Blue.
Mitch Again ●
- 5 stars Rating: 91
3293 votes total - (2750)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
pappy121 said...
First I really do not think you have seen this debate/question here is because most the people here I believe are like me. I could really careless about ohio except for 1 week or one Saturday a year. I rarely go to the other recruiting sites anymore because of all the ohio trolls and would like to keep this site clean.
Second I disagree with the NCAA on the whole tattoo scandal. The kids sold their own property for those tattoos. I do not see what the issue was. I ran X-country and track in college. People can say what they want about a free education as a student athlete but when you are broke you are broke and being a competitive athlete takes more time than just a 40 hour week. I often wonder if It would of been easier to just work my way through school. I really think it would of been easier then again in secondhand sports there is not a professional career when school is over.
Third and most importantly. Cheating is cheating no matter what you gain from it. How can you brag, talk smack, or even be remotely proud of your accomplishments knowing they were achieved by deceit, lies, and corruption of the rules? To me it is not worth it and just down right dirty. If you are looking for justification for what your program did or what it stands for I am sorry but you will not get it from me.
SDWolverine
- 5 stars Rating: 96
6428 votes total - (6527)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
pappy121 said....
Second I disagree with the NCAA on the whole tattoo scandal. The kids sold their own property for those tattoos. I do not see what the issue was. I ran X-country and track in college. People can say what they want about a free education as a student athlete but when you are broke you are broke and being a competitive athlete takes more time than just a 40 hour week. I often wonder if It would of been easier to just work my way through school. I really think it would of been easier then again in secondhand sports there is not a professional career when school is over.
-
buttesnake
- 5 stars Rating: 90
18754 votes total - (27991)
- 26 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
inuyesta said...
But...but...if college athletes were allowed to sell their own property...people might pay them too much for it! Intentionally! And that would be like paying the athletes for their performance! God forbid we let those kids get any cut of all the money they produce...
SDWolverine
- 5 stars Rating: 96
6428 votes total - (6527)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
buttesnake said...
Look, you're forgetting that this boils down to recruiting advantages which equal wins down the line. Kids know you can get paid at osu, so they decide to commit there. They sell their stuff, Tressel covers it up, and the cycle continues. It's cheating, plain and simple.
SDWolverine
- 5 stars Rating: 96
6428 votes total - (6527)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
inuyesta said...
But...but...if college athletes were allowed to sell their own property...people might pay them too much for it! Intentionally! And that would be like paying the athletes for their performance! God forbid we let those kids get any cut of all the money they produce...
CorchBlue
- 5 stars Rating: 89
4860 votes total - King Wolverine247 Mod
- (14232)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
CorchBlue
- 5 stars Rating: 89
4860 votes total - King Wolverine247 Mod
- (14232)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | ... | 7

















NO... TO HELL WITH OHIO.











about their athletes' academics. But take a look at the top programs in each BCS conference...how many programs actually fit that bill? I'm thinking its like Michigan, Stanford, Texas, Notre Dame, and USC along with maybe UCLA and Cal, and that's pretty much it. Throw in a few schools like Duke, Vanderbilt, etc if you get rid of the "have a good football program" requirement. But for the other 100 or so FBS programs? That argument holds no water at all.
Would you do it the osu way for 10 years of success?