-
LEXwolverine1 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 94
706 votes total - (1222)
- 15 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
RoboBuckeye said...
Well since we won't be utilizing a true TE, I don't consider it a position on our team. By your admission that OSU has edge in DE's, DB's and WR's that is good enough for me and my "playmaker" statement.
As for the DT's, since only 2 are on the field at a time, I still like OSU's smaller yet talented group.
It's not a shocker we both like our team better than the other.......that's why we are on the side we chose....
TAMUWolverine ●
- 5 stars Rating: 88
4552 votes total - (20771)
- 26 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
mason01 said...
I like fact to TAMU, The last 2 OSU classes were ranked ahead of Michigan's, makes it easier than writing down every player at every position, especially since many will play different positions when they get to college, but that's what makes it fun.
TAMUWolverine ●
- 5 stars Rating: 88
4552 votes total - (20771)
- 26 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
TAMUWolverine said...
Thanks for responding with facts. While, you guys have had higher ranked classes, it's really splitting hairs, considering both are top-5ish classes. I was merely trying to show how it's splitting hairs by the fact that it's pretty much an even split in terms of talent at each position.
-
mason01 said...
There is a lot to like about the last two Michigan classes, I would be willing to trade you a corner for a tackle, lol! I only hope to see in the near future more BIG teams in the top 20, I would love to see our conference become more balanced, how fun is basketball this year, I want a football conference like that! Sick of hearing that stupid chant, SEC, SEC, well I guess we should be happy that they figured how to spell it! Question is, how many would know what it stands for :)
This post was edited by MrWoodson on 2/25/2013 at 11:57 PM
MrWoodson ●
- 5 stars Rating: 91
21078 votes total - (15267)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
RoboBuckeye
- 4 stars Rating: 66
1681 votes total - (1051)
- 16 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
RoboBuckeye said...
What facts? It has pretty much been opinion....What fun would a board be if there were no opinions?
Ok, fact....our classes have been ranked higher.....
Doesn't mean much since as I've said, we won't know if any of these boys play a down or not...
I just believe that OSU has had better all around recruiting, filling the needs that we were lacking, which was playmakers on both sides of the ball.
I understand you have had awesome OL recruiting...
Mitch Again
- 5 stars Rating: 91
2928 votes total - (2464)
- 16 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
RoboBuckeye
- 4 stars Rating: 66
1681 votes total - (1051)
- 16 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
RoboBuckeye said...
What facts? It has pretty much been opinion....What fun would a board be if there were no opinions?
Ok, fact....our classes have been ranked higher.....
Doesn't mean much since as I've said, we won't know if any of these boys play a down or not...
I just believe that OSU has had better all around recruiting, filling the needs that we were lacking, which was playmakers on both sides of the ball.
I understand you have had awesome OL recruiting...
TAMUWolverine ●
- 5 stars Rating: 88
4552 votes total - (20771)
- 26 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
RoboBuckeye
- 4 stars Rating: 66
1681 votes total - (1051)
- 16 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
RoboBuckeye said...
Dude, I'm NOT arguing with you....As I said, YOU like your class better and I like ours better. What's the difference??
We both got pieces to our own puzzles, and also as I said, it's all for not right now as we won't know anything until these guys produce on the field.
OSU now is based on speed, on both sides of the ball, UM is based on what they want, power football, control LOS and such..
I am excited with ours because I believe it is the way to compete across the board, you are excited for yours because you believe the same....
We are in a holding pattern to see who's system is going to beat the other. Won't know tomorrow, so all we can do is talk about it right now.
Not intending on ruffling feathers
MrWoodson ●
- 5 stars Rating: 91
21078 votes total - (15267)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
RoboBuckeye
- 4 stars Rating: 66
1681 votes total - (1051)
- 16 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Mitch Again
- 5 stars Rating: 91
2928 votes total - (2464)
- 16 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
RoboBuckeye
- 4 stars Rating: 66
1681 votes total - (1051)
- 16 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
MrWoodson ●
- 5 stars Rating: 91
21078 votes total - (15267)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
RoboBuckeye said...
well having the winningest coach in CFB putting the team together to "try" to match what he put together at UF will be ok with me. Difference is, RR totally forgot about the defense. Urban is prioritizing it. Comparing RR to Urban...tsk tsk...
This post was edited by MrWoodson on 2/27/2013 at 1:41 AM
MrWoodson ●
- 5 stars Rating: 91
21078 votes total - (15267)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
MrWoodson said...
Hey, it's ok with us too. It will be very entertaining watching Urbie try to replicate what he did at UF given that (1) he no longer has an entire roster full of top Florida talent to work with and (2) college defenses have "caught up" in terms of defending spread offenses.
This post was edited by Awink2 on 2/27/2013 at 3:22 AM
-
RoboBuckeye said...
well having the winningest coach in CFB putting the team together to "try" to match what he put together at UF will be ok with me. Difference is, RR totally forgot about the defense. Urban is prioritizing it. Comparing RR to Urban...tsk tsk...
www.neoavatara.com/blog
neoavatara ●
- 5 stars Rating: 92
2104 votes total - (4957)
- 21 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
MrWoodson ●
- 5 stars Rating: 91
21078 votes total - (15267)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
a2brutus said...
???? the spread is 10x's more fun to watch then (3 yds and a cloud of dust)...
as for what is more successful? well, time will tell...
tress went 12-0 with the most boring o ever
urban went 12-0 with a very exciting o, so both are proven to work...
as far as hard, smash mouth football, urban runs that too, look at our rb's; hyde, r smith, dunn (these are not little scat backs)
i know urbz didnt recruit hyde and smith, but he did close on dunn and is offering some big backs going forward...
i will admit, i was (and still am to an extent) torn about the idea of running the spread, however, if complimented with some power and real tough d's, i think (and hope) it can work...
of course, in the end, i will take the w (being it smash mouth or spread) but ya gotta admit, its more fun watching your team score 30 plus vs winning 10-7 (see tress ball)
www.neoavatara.com/blog
neoavatara ●
- 5 stars Rating: 92
2104 votes total - (4957)
- 21 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Pages: 1 | ... | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | ... | 88














Will Meyer be left with scraps at OL?