Online Now 548

Wolverine247 Board

The place for discussion on the Michigan Wolverines

On this Board 301
Record: 2671 (1/26/2013)

Online now 470
Record: 7264 (3/12/2012)

Reply

Will Meyer be left with scraps at OL?

  • mason01 said...

    Actually I was addressing more of his Gholston attack, he went off of what he did in the pro's if you read his post, and to your argument then Gholston was a heck of a college player being a top 10 pick :). I say that the pro career has no relavence to the story.

    Jake Long's college career > Vernon Gholston's college career shrug

    signature image signature image signature image

    Go Blue & Gig Em'!

    TAMUWolverine ●

  • mason01 said...

    Actually I was addressing more of his Gholston attack, he went off of what he did in the pro's if you read his post, and to your argument then Gholston was a heck of a college player being a top 10 pick :). I say that the pro career has no relavence to the story.

    True. But I'd say Long had a better college career.

    signature image

    Rabid ●

  • aMAIZEing said...

    True. But I'd say Long had a better college career.

    Was that even a debate? I never said Gholston was better, did I? Gholston owes the reason he was drafted so high based on 3 performances, Michigan game, PSU game, and the combine. There is no comparison between longs college or pro career to gholston's it's long hands down, never argued that nor would I!

    mason01

  • TAMUWolverine said...

    The Jake Long that gave up 3 sacks in his entire 4 year college career. The Jake Long that was the #1 pick in the NFL, Pro Bowler and future Hall of Famer. Or we could be referring about the same Gholston who doesn't even have 10 sacks in his entire NFL career and could be claimed as one of the biggest busts in NFL history. Nice try, though.

    Well since all the UM guys are better in the NFL, then I guess that means the Buckeyes were better coached in college...I'll take that.

    signature image

    BestoftheBig

  • BestoftheBig said...

    Well since all the UM guys are better in the NFL, then I guess that means the Buckeyes were better coached in college...I'll take that.

    Where do these idiots come from?. What kind of logic is this?

    signature image signature image signature image

    SteelBlue0348

  • Mason Cole > Marcelys Jones and Kyle Trout put together.

    signature image signature image signature image

    CMXI ●

  • CMXI said...

    Mason Cole > Marcelys Jones and Kyle Trout put together.

    That would make Cole the first ever 8 star! Lol

    :)

    mason01

  • CMXI said...

    Mason Cole > Marcelys Jones and Kyle Trout put together.

    Once again, everyone you get is SOOOO much better than anyone OSU gets....That should lead to UM winning 10 of the next 11 like OSU has the previous 11? Willing to take friendly wagers if so....

    Also, congrats on getting a recruit out of the Sunshine state....It's good for the BIG to get in and take some...

    RoboBuckeye

  • RoboBuckeye said...

    Once again, everyone you get is SOOOO much better than anyone OSU gets....That should lead to UM winning 10 of the next 11 like OSU has the previous 11? Willing to take friendly wagers if so....

    Also, congrats on getting a recruit out of the Sunshine state....It's good for the BIG to get in and take some...

    It's just the name of the game. Maybe OSU can catch up eventually.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Damaged goods

    MaizeandBlue21

  • RoboBuckeye said...

    Once again, everyone you get is SOOOO much better than anyone OSU gets....That should lead to UM winning 10 of the next 11 like OSU has the previous 11? Willing to take friendly wagers if so....

    Also, congrats on getting a recruit out of the Sunshine state....It's good for the BIG to get in and take some...

    Our OL hauls the last 2 years are better than yours. You cannot argue that one.

    signature image signature image signature image

    “Those who stay will be champions” ― Bo Schembechler

    UMRSB

  • UMRSB said...

    Our OL hauls the last 2 years are better than yours. You cannot argue that one.

    Well no there is no argument there. I think every other position we've recruited better than UM...Defensively no comparison. Playmakers, no comparison. QB's, tough call as they are two totally different types, we'll have to see on that one, both good at what they do.

    RoboBuckeye

  • RoboBuckeye said...

    Well no there is no argument there. I think every other position we've recruited better than UM...Defensively no comparison. Playmakers, no comparison. QB's, tough call as they are two totally different types, we'll have to see on that one, both good at what they do.

    Our OL, RB's, TE's, LB's DT's and Safeties our better. Your WR's, DE's and CB's have been better, QB is a wash IMO. It's really splitting hairs, though, both have had top 5 or 6 classes.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Go Blue & Gig Em'!

    TAMUWolverine ●

  • TAMUWolverine said...

    Our OL, RB's, TE's, LB's DT's and Safeties our better. Your WR's, DE's and CB's have been better, QB is a wash IMO. It's really splitting hairs, though, both have had top 5 or 6 classes.

    I'd have to argue on the RB's, LB's and DT's....You got a big horse at RB that fits Hoke's system, that's a given, but we got two that are perfect for our system. And our LB's, I gotta take Johnson and Mitchell over yours this year.

    It's all moot at this point as we could look back 4 years from now and none of these guys even played....

    This post was edited by RoboBuckeye on 2/25/2013 at 7:57 PM

    RoboBuckeye

  • RoboBuckeye said...

    I'd have to argue on the RB's, LB's and DT's....You got a big horse at RB that fits Hoke's system, that's a given, but we got two that are perfect for our system.

    We got three that are perfect for our system.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Ducksworth

  • Ducksworth said...

    We got three that are perfect for our system.

    But there's only one ball!! j/k....something I was told when in convo about the spread offense vs power I offense...

    RoboBuckeye

  • RoboBuckeye said...

    Well no there is no argument there. I think every other position we've recruited better than UM...Defensively no comparison. Playmakers, no comparison. QB's, tough call as they are two totally different types, we'll have to see on that one, both good at what they do.

    moon

    signature image

    LEXwolverine1

  • RoboBuckeye said...

    But there's only one ball!! j/k....something I was told when in convo about the spread offense vs power I offense...

    Alabama manages. And I'm by no means comparing the backs we got to ones Bama gets. They're at a different level. Only one that stacks up is Green.

    signature image signature image signature image

    fursty13

  • LEXwolverine1 said...

    moon

    Now that's just not nice

    RoboBuckeye

  • fursty13 said...

    Alabama manages. And I'm by no means comparing the backs we got to ones Bama gets. They're at a different level. Only one that stacks up is Green.

    And Bama took 4 or 5 RB's this year....Gonna be like USC back when Carroll was there, half will transfer out.or Saban will "cut" them to make room 2 years from now. Can't understand that many highly rated RB's all going to the same school in the same class when Yeldon will be totin the rock for 2 more...

    RoboBuckeye

  • RoboBuckeye said...

    I'd have to argue on the RB's, LB's and DT's....You got a big horse at RB that fits Hoke's system, that's a given, but we got two that are perfect for our system. And our LB's, I gotta take Johnson and Mitchell over yours this year.

    It's all moot at this point as we could look back 4 years from now and none of these guys even played....

    RB's composite score
    Michigan(last 2 classes)
    4* Norfleet
    3* Drake Johnson
    3* Sione Houma
    5* Derrick Green
    4* Deveon Smith
    4* Wyatt Shallman

    OSU(last 2 classes)
    4* Dunn
    4* Ball
    4* Elliot
    4* Wilson

    LB's - WE CAN CALL THIS ONE A WASH
    Michigan(last 2 classes)
    3* Kaleb Ringer
    4* Joe Bolden
    4* James Ross
    4* Royce Jenkins Stone
    4* Ben Gedeon
    4* Mike McCray

    OSU(last 2 classes)
    4* Perry
    3* Powell
    4* Williams
    4* Perkins
    4* Johnson
    4* Mitchell
    3* Roberts

    I'll do TE, Safety and DT next

    signature image signature image signature image

    Go Blue & Gig Em'!

    TAMUWolverine ●

  • TAMUWolverine said...

    RB's composite score Michigan(last 2 classes) 4* Norfleet 3* Drake Johnson 3* Sione Houma 5* Derrick Green 4* Deveon Smith 4* Wyatt Shallman

    OSU(last 2 classes) 4* Dunn 4* Ball 4* Elliot 4* Wilson

    LB's - WE CAN CALL THIS ONE A WASH Michigan(last 2 classes) 3* Kaleb Ringer 4* Joe Bolden 4* James Ross 4* Royce Jenkins Stone 4* Ben Gedeon 4* Mike McCray

    OSU(last 2 classes) 4* Perry 3* Powell 4* Williams 4* Perkins 4* Johnson 4* Mitchell 3* Roberts

    I'll do TE, Safety and DT next

    Well, TE should go to UM as OSU won't be utilizing a true TE much anymore.

    RoboBuckeye

  • TE - edge goes to Michigan

    Michigan(last 2 classes)
    4* Funchess
    4* Williams
    4* Butt
    3* Hill

    OSU(last 2 classes)
    3* Thomas
    4* Baugh

    DT- edge goes to Michigan

    Michigan(last 2 classes)
    4* Pipkins
    4* Wormley
    4* Godin
    3* Henry
    4* Poggi
    4* Hurst Jr

    OSU(last 2 classes)
    4* Schutt
    4* Price
    4* Munger
    4* Hill

    Safety( I was wrong on this) edge to OSU

    Michigan(last 2 classes)
    4* Wilson
    3* Gant
    3* Clark
    4* Thomas
    4* Hill
    3* Stribling

    OSU(last 2 classes)
    4* Bogard
    3* Murray
    5* Bell
    4* Thompson
    3* Worley(I think he's a safety)

    signature image signature image signature image

    Go Blue & Gig Em'!

    TAMUWolverine ●

  • RoboBuckeye said...

    Well, TE should go to UM as OSU won't be utilizing a true TE much anymore.

    Well, you're the one that said OSU had better head to head talent at every single position. Last time I checked, TE was a position on the field. It's just one of the multiple positions that Michigan has better than OSU. I was just proving your lack of knowledge on our class. Michigan will be just fine, we've signed just as much talent as OSU across the board.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Go Blue & Gig Em'!

    TAMUWolverine ●

  • TAMUWolverine said...

    Well, you're the one that said OSU had better head to head talent at every single position. Last time I checked, TE was a position on the field. It's just one of the multiple positions that Michigan has better than OSU. I was just proving your lack of knowledge on our class. Michigan will be just fine, we've signed just as much talent as OSU across the board.

    Well since we won't be utilizing a true TE, I don't consider it a position on our team. By your admission that OSU has edge in DE's, DB's and WR's that is good enough for me and my "playmaker" statement.

    As for the DT's, since only 2 are on the field at a time, I still like OSU's smaller yet talented group.

    It's not a shocker we both like our team better than the other.......that's why we are on the side we chose....

    RoboBuckeye

  • RoboBuckeye said...

    Well since we won't be utilizing a true TE, I don't consider it a position on our team. By your admission that OSU has edge in DE's, DB's and WR's that is good enough for me and my "playmaker" statement.

    As for the DT's, since only 2 are on the field at a time, I still like OSU's smaller yet talented group.

    It's not a shocker we both like our team better than the other.......that's why we are on the side we chose....

    Um...you guys did take a very good TE recruit last year, no? Wasn't like Baugh was an after thought.

    www.neoavatara.com/blog

    neoavatara

Michigan
247Sports
Features
Resources
Connect

247Sports In partnership with CBS Sports