Online Now 761

Wolverine247 Board

The place for discussion on the Michigan Wolverines

On this Board 450
Record: 2671 (1/26/2013)

Online now 637
Record: 7264 (3/12/2012)

Reply

Will Meyer be left with scraps at OL?

  • CMXI said...

    This hurts in the OL department, that's why it's funny. OLs are one of the positions where it's very, very, very difficult to come in and contribute as a freshman, so pushing back one of the OLs reduces viable depth even more. OSU was already looking at depleted depth in 2014-15, and it could be even worse with O'Connor gone.

    On top of that, I'm a firm believer in the bird-in-the-bush v. bird-in-the-hand theory - it's infinitely more valuable to have a solid OL in the fold already than merely the potential for more. What happens if Skipper and Hunt stick with their commitments? It sounds all well and good that there's more open spots now, but Urban hasn't exactly knocked it out of the park with OL recruiting so far, and there's no reason to believe that he'll turn it around suddenly in the next couple weeks.

    I get ya, but honestly, if you have someone on your team that either A) isn't "getting it" and not going to play or B) just isn't happy for whatever reason and wants to be somewhere else, then the odds of them becoming a valuable contributer aren't very good. So I say, I hope he finds what he's looking for and I'm not worried with our OL numbers, we have 13 or 14 OL on roster, a few more on the way, and a few more next year. Hope it works out, but little I can do, so I choose not to sweat it..

    RoboBuckeye

  • RoboBuckeye said...

    I'm not sure why that would be funny, all it does is open 2 more spots for Urban to fill this year with players that may contribute to his system. I'm all for it. If they guys weren't going to get playing time, move on to somewhere they'll be happy and we'll get to add maybe one of the Oregon commits or Timmons from KY. All good to me.

    It's funny because you guys need OL. You lost an OL that had a year under his belt at OSU. Now if you sign more OL you have been set back a year. This led to all of the roflmao

    hownowbrowncow

  • RoboBuckeye said...

    I get ya, but honestly, if you have someone on your team that either A) isn't "getting it" and not going to play or B) just isn't happy for whatever reason and wants to be somewhere else, then the odds of them becoming a valuable contributer aren't very good. So I say, I hope he finds what he's looking for and I'm not worried with our OL numbers, we have 13 or 14 OL on roster, a few more on the way, and a few more next year. Hope it works out, but little I can do, so I choose not to sweat it..

    I'll agree that someone who isn't happy probably won't be a valuable contributor (see Dwight Howard, Lakers), but the fact of the matter is, he was a talented 4-star prospect and it always hurts to lose good depth, especially when you're in OSU's current situation.

    signature image signature image signature image

    CMXI

  • CMXI said...

    I'll agree that someone who isn't happy probably won't be a valuable contributor (see Dwight Howard, Lakers), but the fact of the matter is, he was a talented 4-star prospect and it always hurts to lose good depth, especially when you're in OSU's current situation.

    it does, i would have rather not seen him go with our numbers, even if he wasnt going to contribute solid depth is important. I am staying optimistic about the converted Dlineman just because they played Oline in highschool. Most of Farris offers were actually for the Oline. However, just as an earlier poster said contributing right away on the Oline is almost impossible which is why it is important not to have a few stay and contribute from each class even if it be for depth.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Diegobuck

  • Diegobuck said...

    it does, i would have rather not seen him go with our numbers, even if he wasnt going to contribute solid depth is important. I am staying optimistic about the converted Dlineman just because they played Oline in highschool. Most of Farris offers were actually for the Oline. However, just as an earlier poster said contributing right away on the Oline is almost impossible which is why it is important not to have a few stay and contribute from each class even if it be for depth.

    Diegobuck I tried so hard to read your post but kept loosing focus because of that ungodly hott asian in your signature haha. Very nice

    signature image

    LEXwolverine1

  • LEXwolverine1 said...

    Diegobuck I tried so hard to read your post but kept loosing focus because of that ungodly hott asian in your signature haha. Very nice

    haha thanks man, i got the yellow plague. apparently im not the only one. lol

    signature image signature image signature image

    Diegobuck

  • LEXwolverine1 said...

    Diegobuck I tried so hard to read your post but kept loosing focus because of that ungodly hott asian in your signature haha. Very nice

    She's our main hostess for the recruits.....

    RoboBuckeye

  • RoboBuckeye said...

    She's our main hostess for the recruits.....

    no wonder you guys keep signing these top classes. Why else would recruits go to Cbus.... sarcasm

    BTW It's awesome to have these conversations with you buckeyes who come in peace to give your take on the situation and talk football. Reminds me of being back home where I'm surrounded with friendly buckeyes fans. Good work fellas.

    signature image

    LEXwolverine1

  • LEXwolverine1 said...

    no wonder you guys keep signing these top classes. Why else would recruits go to Cbus.... sarcasm

    BTW It's awesome to have these conversations with you buckeyes who come in peace to give your take on the situation and talk football. Reminds me of being back home where I'm surrounded with friendly buckeyes fans. Good work fellas.

    Dude, I'm from Lexington, same as you, what do you expect? We're just good, hard working, down to earth "folk"....

    This post was edited by RoboBuckeye on 1/24/2013 at 12:06 AM

    RoboBuckeye

  • RoboBuckeye said...

    I get ya, but honestly, if you have someone on your team that either A) isn't 'getting it' and not going to play or B) just isn't happy for whatever reason and wants to be somewhere else, then the odds of them becoming a valuable contributer aren't very good. So I say, I hope he finds what he's looking for and I'm not worried with our OL numbers, we have 13 or 14 OL on roster, a few more on the way, and a few more next year. Hope it works out, but little I can do, so I choose not to sweat it..

    Im not arguing your A and B points, but the point of a recruit is not to have these what if clauses/excuses. A recruit should be able to provide depth and play making ability to the team now and into the future, if you resort to either A or B, you missed a golden opportunity to make your team immediately better, and will have to wait for the person who takes his scholarship to pan out, which they might not, which contributes even more to the initial loss in the first place.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Awink2

  • CMXI said...

    I'll agree that someone who isn't happy probably won't be a valuable contributor (see Dwight Howard, Lakers), but the fact of the matter is, he was a talented 4-star prospect and it always hurts to lose good depth, especially when you're in OSU's current situation.

    Not just that he wasn't happy. Dude was one more surgery away from having robot knees -- never really got a chance to see what he could contribute.

    The LB that left basically shattered his ankle in HS and Tress honored his scholarship. He's never been the same and has basically been hurt ever since.

    signature image

    Time and change will surely (truly) show How firm thy friendship ... OHIO!

    callen05

  • Awink2 said...

    Im not arguing your A and B points, but the point of a recruit is not to have these what if clauses/excuses. A recruit should be able to provide depth and play making ability to the team now and into the future, if you resort to either A or B, you missed a golden opportunity to make your team immediately better, and will have to wait for the person who takes his scholarship to pan out, which they might not, which contributes even more to the initial loss in the first place.

    I'm not arguing with you either, I'm just saying guys leave for any number of reasons. Yeah, sometimes it sucks when it's a position you're thin, but it happens. There is no chance that every recruit that comes in will contribute or stay 4/5 years. Just nature of the beast. But my point is if they weren't going to contribute, then it really doesn't bother me that they chose to leave. If we bring someone else in and they don't contribute, it's a wash...if they do contribute then it's a win...there is no loss in this instance since they were not in contention to get on the field.

    In my defense, even if Braxton decided to leave, I'd wish him well. These are 18=22 year olds, they don't define my life. I love my Buckeyes, but I don't wrap my hopes and dreams around their success. Some act like their favorite team is the most important thing in their life and act like total psycho's over them. I'm not one of those fans.

    This post was edited by RoboBuckeye on 1/24/2013 at 10:00 PM

    RoboBuckeye

  • RoboBuckeye said...

    Dude, I'm from Lexington, same as you, what do you expect? We're just good, hard working, down to earth "folk"....

    LOL I worked in Lex for 5 years I built the new court houses, the addition to UK Hospital as well as the ped-way across rose to the other building we done, also built plenty on UK campus like the library
    I lived in Georgetown behind Scott Co. High, coach Cronin recruited my son while he was still in little league football, Scott Co likes football ;)

    signature image signature image

    TRUxBLUxFAN

  • TRUxBLUxFAN said...

    LOL I worked in Lex for 5 years I built the new court houses, the addition to UK Hospital as well as the ped-way across rose to the other building we done, also built plenty on UK campus like the library I lived in Georgetown behind Scott Co. High, coach Cronin recruited my son while he was still in little league football, Scott Co likes football ;)

    Lexington, OH.....my bad

    very small rural town about 45 minutes north of "The Shoe"....

    RoboBuckeye

  • Michigan addressed their only recruiting weakspot today... will the cockeyes be able to?

    thevictor_11

  • RoboBuckeye said...

    Dude, I'm from Lexington, same as you, what do you expect? We're just good, hard working, down to earth "folk"....

    Couldn't agree more haha!

    signature image

    LEXwolverine1

  • thevictor_11 said...

    Michigan addressed their only recruiting weakspot today... will the cockeyes be able to?

    Looking at the recruiting list, rankings, etc. I think the BUCKEYES will be very happy come NSD.

    As for our OL, we don't have a weak OL....evidenced by the rushing yardage we averaged per game. All of our OL are back except for the converted TE that played RT. Now, if we have a bunch of injuries next season, we could be in a bit of trouble, but what team wouldn't be? Same could be said for some of UM's positions as well. What if DGard goes down? What if Braxton goes down? I like our OL, and it is a priority for 2014 as we already have one commit and Trout is said to be a very heavy OSU lean. I look for us to take 5 OL in 2014, so I'm not too concerned. Our actual weakness was at WR/Slot, which we have a couple promising playmakers coming in, if they pan out they could be great. It's a crapshoot.

    RoboBuckeye

  • RoboBuckeye said...

    Looking at the recruiting list, rankings, etc. I think the BUCKEYES will be very happy come NSD.

    As for our OL, we don't have a weak OL....evidenced by the rushing yardage we averaged per game. All of our OL are back except for the converted TE that played RT. Now, if we have a bunch of injuries next season, we could be in a bit of trouble, but what team wouldn't be? Same could be said for some of UM's positions as well. What if DGard goes down? What if Braxton goes down? I like our OL, and it is a priority for 2014 as we already have one commit and Trout is said to be a very heavy OSU lean. I look for us to take 5 OL in 2014, so I'm not too concerned. Our actual weakness was at WR/Slot, which we have a couple promising playmakers coming in, if they pan out they could be great. It's a crapshoot.

    How many spots do you have in the class for 2014? Will 5 OL end up being a quarter or more of your class?

    signature image signature image signature image

    CMXI

  • RoboBuckeye said...

    Same could be said for some of UM's positions as well. What if DGard goes down?

    sugar shane

    This post was edited by Wolverines89 on 1/27/2013 at 4:34 AM

    Wolverines89

  • CMXI said...

    How many spots do you have in the class for 2014? Will 5 OL end up being a quarter or more of your class?

    It's tough to say...This year we thought we'd have 20 max but then with transfers, NFL EE, etc there's no way to know that number this far off. I am guessing we take 4 or 5 OL and 4 LB next year. So almost half could be taken up by those two positions.

    RoboBuckeye

  • Wolverines89 said...

    sugar shane

    I'd figure he'd redshirt.

    RoboBuckeye

  • Now that we have Derrick Green in the fold and it's hard to argue against our future bowling ball of an offense, the bucknuts are now saying Hoke is neglecting to recruit on the defensive side of the ball lol. They're in for a surprise.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Mitch Again

  • BUMP for Dan Skipper going to Arkansas

    jnewberg24

  • jnewberg24 said...

    BUMP for Dan Skipper going to Arkansas

    roflmaoroflmaoswirl

    signature image signature image signature image

    RicoX19

  • HAHAHAHAHAHA! They didn't want him anyway...
    1) "The kid doesn't start for his own HS Team"
    2) "We're saving all the OL schollies for 2014 Class"
    3) "We're recruiting for speed on the OL...doesn't fit our needs right now"

    Take your pick! roflmao

    ahoyfrmmi