-
jmitch1 said...
All time wins, I'll concede.... UM takes the cake there... I don't like using that statistic since it's skewed (UM football est 1879, AU 1892), but I'll concede it because of the winning percentage. UM-73%, AU-63%. Not a huge gap, but a gap nonetheless.
Conf championships have nothing to do w/ each other, since #1 we're in different conferences and #2 AU didn't join a conference until 1933.
What other numerous stats you got? Heisman winners? Nope, 3 each. All-Americans:76-68? So less than 1 for the 13 yrs longer that y'all have on us? Claimed NC's? You guys claim 11.... but they're wierd, who would claim some of those, except Alabama of course.... We claim 2, but have 7 unclaimed (only AP claimed, which coincidentally UM has 2 AP titles as well)... Because we don't claim what we didn't earn...
I'm failing to see where Michigan is really that much more of a "powerhouse" than AU is.... maybe you can enlighten me?
-
Amazinglyblue78
- 5 stars Rating: 86
378 votes total - (1197)
- 14 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Ducksworth said...
Alright let's see....
1. Denard was not a runner up for the Heisman. And his injury is the reason he wasn't the starting QB at the end of the year.
2. I'm not impressed. Any team could have bought Cam Newton, and he's the only reason you won.
3. We were "pretty good" until the '90s? You realize we won a NC in the '90s? And we were a hit to the head away from the NCG in 2006?
4. We did not miss a bowl game last year or the year before. In fact, we played in a BCS bowl game. You, however, missed a bowl game this year. I don't know if you remember, but you went 3-9.
5. How in the hell are the two programs "pretty darn even in every statistical category"? -Wins: 903 for Michigan. 721 for Auburn -Winning %: 73.4% for Michigan. 63% for Auburn -NCs: 11 for Michigan. 2 for Auburn -Conference Championships: 42 for Michigan. 11 for Auburn -Heisman winners: 3 for Michigan. 3 for Auburn. Yay, you're tied! -Consensus All Americans: 78 for Michigan. 66 for Auburn -Attendance: 114,804 for Michigan. 87,451 for Auburn.
I don't like looking at past stats because they're completely pointless, but seriously? Pretty darn even?
-
Ducksworth
- 5 stars Rating: 92
8948 votes total - Wolverine247 Moderator
- (15530)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Ducksworth said...
Means we've been to more bowl games than you. Which is better. And we missed a bowl game twice in the past 50 years or something. You miss bowl games every other year.
*neither of those is factually accurate, I'm not going to look it up. But they're close.
This post was edited by jmitch1 on 1/25/2013 at 9:29 PM
-
Jack Daniels
- 5 stars Rating: 92
679 votes total - (1093)
- 16 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
robertogburn
- 4 stars Rating: 62
1777 votes total - (1396)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Jack Daniels
- 5 stars Rating: 92
679 votes total - (1093)
- 16 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
robertogburn said...
It's been 10 years since Michigan has been relevant. Ohio State owns you. Bama might have won 3 out of 4 but we won the other. We've had 2 undefeated seasons in the last 9 years and won the NC. You can't even come close to that. Thanks for playing biotch
This post was edited by AnthonyBourdain on 1/25/2013 at 10:16 PM
AnthonyBourdain
- 5 stars Rating: 83
342 votes total - (1396)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Ducksworth
- 5 stars Rating: 92
8948 votes total - Wolverine247 Moderator
- (15530)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
robertogburn
- 4 stars Rating: 62
1777 votes total - (1396)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
robertogburn said...
I would be respectful but as soon as I post I get called a hillbilly redneck. Auburn fans are intelligent and knowledgeable when it comes to football...
Michigan uses an inflated number of NCs like Alabama. 10 of your NCs were before 1950. You have 1 NC in the modern era of college football. If Auburn were to use the same logic, Auburn could claim 9... 1910, 1913, 1914, 1957, 1958, 1983, 1993, 2004, 2010... That would be 6 in the modern era
Don't look down your nose at Auburn. We don't stand down to anyone. We are just as much if not more than a college football powerhouse as Michigan... BTW, you're 0-3 in your last 3 games vs. the SEC. They call that a losing streak
Ducksworth
- 5 stars Rating: 92
8948 votes total - Wolverine247 Moderator
- (15530)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Pages: 1 | ... | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11




















0-8 in sec play. I believe 50-0 against your Tuscaloosa neighbors. Fake rings pretending to be champions back in the day. Etc etc etc.
Official Derrick Green Thread