-
Due51 said...
Technically, "Non-Commitable Offer" should really be called "A Contingency Offer" Usually these go out to kids who are on the fence grade-wise. A coach will say "We'll offer you a scholarship but before we take your commitment, you'll have to prove that you have the grades/test scores to qualify."
Now, we did have a kid last year who had an offer and ALLEGEDLY tried to commit to Michigan but the coaches told him to slow his role (Tommy Schutt, I think). In that scenario, the coaches had Pipkins on the hook and were just waiting for his commitment. They didn't want to jeopardize it by taking Schutt. That happens all the time,. Teams send out anywhere from 50 to 100 offers. They eventually have to tell SOMEONE there's no more room.
MaizeandBlue21 ●
- 4 stars Rating: 79
7444 votes total - (16226)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Due51 said...
Technically, "Non-Commitable Offer" should really be called "A Contingency Offer" Usually these go out to kids who are on the fence grade-wise. A coach will say "We'll offer you a scholarship but before we take your commitment, you'll have to prove that you have the grades/test scores to qualify."
Now, we did have a kid last year who had an offer and ALLEGEDLY tried to commit to Michigan but the coaches told him to slow his role (Tommy Schutt, I think). In that scenario, the coaches had Pipkins on the hook and were just waiting for his commitment. They didn't want to jeopardize it by taking Schutt. That happens all the time,. Teams send out anywhere from 50 to 100 offers. They eventually have to tell SOMEONE there's no more room.
EF_Wolverine ●
- 5 stars Rating: 93
1475 votes total - (1545)
- 26 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
MaizeandBlue21 ●
- 4 stars Rating: 79
7444 votes total - (16226)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Due51 said...
Technically, "Non-Commitable Offer" should really be called "A Contingency Offer" Usually these go out to kids who are on the fence grade-wise. A coach will say "We'll offer you a scholarship but before we take your commitment, you'll have to prove that you have the grades/test scores to qualify."
Now, we did have a kid last year who had an offer and ALLEGEDLY tried to commit to Michigan but the coaches told him to slow his role (Tommy Schutt, I think). In that scenario, the coaches had Pipkins on the hook and were just waiting for his commitment. They didn't want to jeopardize it by taking Schutt. That happens all the time,. Teams send out anywhere from 50 to 100 offers. They eventually have to tell SOMEONE there's no more room.
-
YuanT said...
Aren't all offers contingency offers though? I mean even if a kid looks to be academically qualified early, things could change later right? If a kid committed and then got expelled from HS (a la Yuri Wright), wouldn't that be grounds to pull the scholarship?
As for your second paragraph, I am assuming that in this scenario, grades were not an issue. Why make the offer then? From the recruit's perspective, I think it might be worse to get an offer and be told that he can't use it yet than to just hear that we're interested but not ready to offer yet. To me it's not really an offer if you can't accept it whenever you want. It seems disingenuous.
This post was edited by Due51 on 2/5/2012 at 10:14 AM
-
Due51 said...
Once the class starts filling up, they have to start picking and choosing. When Schutt wanted to visit, the coaches probably knew Pipkins was going to commit. When Pittman tried to commit, the coaches either A) knew he was just trying to find a safe haven until the OSU thing worked itself out or B) he had grade issues (which I'm not sure how that's possible because both MSU and OSU took the commit right away).
-
YuanT said...
If Pipkins was already a silent commit, then I have no problem turning Schutt away because the position was filled. If Pipkins was still undecided, then to me it's like we offered Schutt before we were willing to accept his commitment. Isn't that kinda the flip side of a recruit committing but still looking around? If we're going to say that we wouldn't consider that a commitment, shouldn't we also say that if we're still waiting on better recruits, then we didn't really offer the worse ones?










Non-commitable Offers