Wolverine247 Board

We didn't just beat UGA for a third year in a row....we dragged them up and down the field.

The problem is that would force a rematch in the Cap One between Clemson and USCe, which seems unlikely.

See you in Tampa BLUE.

I agree Clowney can't be blocked all night, but that's also the coaches moving him around the DL so the O can't account for him being in one spot all night. That's what worries me most with Clowney, seeing him line up all over the place and shredding our interior OL. Also, is Bruce Ellington officially done with this football season, or will he be around for the bowl game? I know he went back to basketball, but would assume the coaches of both teams would work something out. The TE's are a little scary since they are a mismatch against anyone, 6'4 and 6'5.

Hopefully by game time, Denard will be 100% but still used in a slash type of role with Gardner as QB. If Denard can throw the ball and keep the D honest, our O can make some plays. Hopefully Borges will put together a great game plan to reassure fans of the future and not just rely on Denard to pull it down and make a big play. Although at this point, I don't care what we do as long as we end the season with a W.

Your not just going to get a piece(twirling his finger around), your going to get the whole thing.

Also, just wanted to thanks scar for the most amazing video of the year. The trainer/bruce ellington video, was the best video of the year.

Also, i love duck hunting. Had a cottage a hundred yards from a wdlife preserve(marsh) eight on the saginaw bay. Also, my dad was a championship caller. He called under art beauchamp and called with butch richinbok(rich in tone calls).

Third, the devin/denard combo is going to have its way with your front seven. I expect your corners and safeties being the top tacklers for tbe game!

and one more just because I can and LoL at Clemson.

But in all seriousness, the backfield is pretty solid. They have had a few "wtf" moments through the year though. Mostly due to young players being cycled in.

Denard at QB is problematic because his nerve injury has prevented him from gripping the ball well enough to throw. When Denard entered the game at QB against OSU in the second half, they started rolling nine up into the box and Denard got nothing.

I have a good friend who is a Gamecocks fan so I have watched several of their games, nonconference or otherwise. If the coaching staff comes out with an offensive gameplan that is anything like what they ran during the season, Michigan will be lucky to make it to the upper teens in points.

I think the defense is good enough to keep it close, and Michigan may get a shot to win it on their last possession. In all likelihood, however, I think Carolina wins by double digits.

But... but... we beat Northwestern who beat Vanderbilt.

I was simply putting our losses into perspective...only losing to 2 undefeated teams, a one loss team, and a team when we didn't have Denard. Trying to compare other teams and how they would match-up against other schools based off of losses does no good. Not sure why I even tried.

You're trying to say Vanderbilt was good because all of their wins came against opponents whose record was below .500? Who is to say they wouldn't be bottom feeders in our conference? All the, this team beat that team and this team lost to that team means your team would do X and Y.....never understood this. Anything can happen any given Sat or Sun, I guess if it was that easy on paper why should they play the games.

This may be the only watchable B1G bowl game this season. Should be a fun one. I'm not looking forward to any other game from the conference.

I always like watching Wisconsin lose but they'll probably end up winning vs Stanford. That I couldn't watch.