Online Now 518

Wolverine247 Board

The place for discussion on the Michigan Wolverines

On this Board 351
Record: 2671 (1/26/2013)

Online now 521
Record: 7264 (3/12/2012)

Reply

LOL at the ultimate Sparty Cry Baby....Valenti

  • Valenti talking to Wetzel about how UNFAIR it is that Michigan could play BCS before them. This guy is annoying...make Gregg Henson sound good

    Dan Wetzel CFB Podcast 11-29 | Yahoo Sports Radio

    Dan Wetzel CFB Podcast 11-29 |

    www.yahoosportsradio.com
    signature image signature image signature image

    RicoX19

  • buttesnake

  • He's also been going crazy since the spring about UM killing them in recruiting. I thought he was going to cut himself when we stole Mario. He knows the window provided by Rodriguez is closing.

    signature image signature image signature image

    EF_Wolverine

  • RicoX19 said...

    Valenti talking to Wetzel about how UNFAIR it is that Michigan could play BCS before them. This guy is annoying...make Gregg Henson sound good

    He can be hypocritical at times and be completely ignorant to it. But, taking our Blue sunglasses off, he has a point. I mean think about it: If this were last year, Michigan State would be walking into the Rose Bowl. They will be punished because they earned the right to play in the Big Ten Championship game. That doesn't seem right. But that is the BCS. We will benefit from it and that is great. If we were in their position, we would be livid. But we aren't, so good wave

    An even better example, which he has mentioned, is the ridiculousness of the National Championship game. Alabama DOESN'T have to beat LSU.....AT HOME.....AT NIGHT......and they DON'T have to play an extra game and win an SEC championship to play in the National Title game. Now i believe that Bama and LSU are the two best teams in the country, but they had their shot at beating LSU with the best advantages they could have gotten (at home at night) and didn't win, and the logistics of Bama getting to the game are ridiculously backwards and make zero sense.

    signature image

    unsaddleddonald

  • unsaddleddonald said...

    He can be hypocritical at times and be completely ignorant to it. But, taking our Blue sunglasses off, he has a point. I mean think about it: If this were last year, Michigan State would be walking into the Rose Bowl. They will be punished because they earned the right to play in the Big Ten Championship game. That doesn't seem right. But that is the BCS. We will benefit from it and that is great. If we were in their position, we would be livid. But we aren't, so good wave

    An even better example, which he has mentioned, is the ridiculousness of the National Championship game. Alabama DOESN'T have to beat LSU.....AT HOME.....AT NIGHT......and they DON'T have to play an extra game and win an SEC championship to play in the National Title game. Now i believe that Bama and LSU are the two best teams in the country, but they had their shot at beating LSU with the best advantages they could have gotten (at home at night) and didn't win, and the logistics of Bama getting to the game are ridiculously backwards and make zero sense.

    MSU controls its own destiny right now, Michigan doesn't. Michigan has done enough to get into a BCS bowl but they have to wait and see if they can get in.

    xxmgobluexx

  • xxmgobluexx said...

    MSU controls its own destiny right now, Michigan doesn't. Michigan has done enough to get into a BCS bowl but they have to wait and see if they can get in.

    If MSU didn't play the title game they would be in the BCS and UM wouldn't. It's that simple. If the situation was reversed this board would be on fire right now. Essentially MSU is being punished by playing a 13th game against arguably the best team in the conference for a second time (a team UM didn't have to play once).

    With that said I don't think that scenario is guarantee. MSU has a pretty decent lead in points in the BCS rankings and if MSU at least makes the game close my bet is the human polls won't punish us enough to drop us below 14. If MSU wins, UM is almost guaranteed a BCS spot so I'd be rehearsing the MSU fight song.

    MichState04

  • MichState04 said...

    If MSU didn't play the title game they would be in the BCS and UM wouldn't. It's that simple. If the situation was reversed this board would be on fire right now. Essentially MSU is being punished by playing a 13th game against arguably the best team in the conference for a second time (a team UM didn't have to play once).

    With that said I don't think that scenario is guarantee. MSU has a pretty decent lead in points in the BCS rankings and if MSU at least makes the game close my bet is the human polls won't punish us enough to drop us below 14. If MSU wins, UM is almost guaranteed a BCS spot so I'd be rehearsing the MSU fight song.

    Human polls might not but the computers have us ahead of you and with another loss they would drop you even further.

    signature image signature image signature image

    ilovetombrady

  • MichState04 said...

    If MSU didn't play the title game they would be in the BCS and UM wouldn't. It's that simple. If the situation was reversed this board would be on fire right now. Essentially MSU is being punished by playing a 13th game against arguably the best team in the conference for a second time (a team UM didn't have to play once).

    With that said I don't think that scenario is guarantee. MSU has a pretty decent lead in points in the BCS rankings and if MSU at least makes the game close my bet is the human polls won't punish us enough to drop us below 14. If MSU wins, UM is almost guaranteed a BCS spot so I'd be rehearsing the MSU fight song.

    I wouldn't and won't. I fully expect Wiscy to lay a beating on Sparty this weekend. The rematch benefits Wiscy in a big way IMO as they can do more things on offense.

    signature image signature image signature image

    mriderblue12

  • MichState04 said...

    If MSU didn't play the title game they would be in the BCS and UM wouldn't. It's that simple. If the situation was reversed this board would be on fire right now. Essentially MSU is being punished by playing a 13th game against arguably the best team in the conference for a second time (a team UM didn't have to play once).

    With that said I don't think that scenario is guarantee. MSU has a pretty decent lead in points in the BCS rankings and if MSU at least makes the game close my bet is the human polls won't punish us enough to drop us below 14. If MSU wins, UM is almost guaranteed a BCS spot so I'd be rehearsing the MSU fight song.

    blahblahblah State is being punished. Cry me a river. The thing you are not understanding is that the CCG game only takes into account conference games which only makes up 2/3rds of the season. The BCS takes into account the whole season which means every single game including conference championship games are going to be counted in the BCS standings. Its the way it is. If MSU had taken care of business in the non conference game against Notre Dame they wouldn't be in this situation.

    signature image signature image signature image

    WillyWolverine

  • ilovetombrady said...

    Human polls might not but the computers have us ahead of you and with another loss they would drop you even further.

    Human polls are 2/3 and computers are 1/3. Doubt a loss to Wisconsin would drop us a ton in the computers.

    MichState04

  • MichState04 said...

    Human polls are 2/3 and computers are 1/3. Doubt a loss to Wisconsin would drop us a ton in the computers.

    MSU is 16th in the computers.. yes it would.

    signature image signature image signature image

    ilovetombrady

  • Maize&Blue said...

    blahblahblah State is being punished. Cry me a river. The thing you are not understanding is that the CCG game only takes into account conference games which only makes up 2/3rds of the season. The BCS takes into account the whole season which means every single game including conference championship games are going to be counted in the BCS standings. Its the way it is. If MSU had taken care of business in the non conference game against Notre Dame they wouldn't be in this situation.

    I won't be crying until Sunday night (maybe). Frankly the Sugar Bowl means absolutely nothing to me. Right now there are two games that mean something and that is Rose and NCG. Everything else is just window dressing. As long as you aren't playing in the Pizza bowl, who really cares. HOWEVER it is still a lame system when playing in a conference championship game demotes you in the bowl picture. Don't worry your team will get bitten by this monkey someday and hopefully a playoff system will emerge when enough schools get tired of this system.

    Yes beating ND or Nebraska would have taken care of this problem and so would beating Wisconsin on Sat. No matter what happens Sunday night will be an interesting one for UM.

    MichState04

  • MichState04 said...

    I won't be crying until Sunday night (maybe). Frankly the Sugar Bowl means absolutely nothing to me. Right now there are two games that mean something and that is Rose and NCG. Everything else is just window dressing. As long as you aren't playing in the Pizza bowl, who really cares. HOWEVER it is still a lame system when playing in a conference championship game demotes you in the bowl picture. Don't worry your team will get bitten by this monkey someday and hopefully a playoff system will emerge when enough schools get tired of this system.

    Yes beating ND or Nebraska would have taken care of this problem and so would beating Wisconsin on Sat. No matter what happens Sunday night will be an interesting one for UM.

    Go back to the rcmb and tell your story.. noone here cares this is a michigan board.

    signature image signature image signature image

    ilovetombrady

  • ilovetombrady said...

    Go back to the rcmb and tell your story.. noone here cares this is a michigan board.

    You should care, the outcome of our game plays a role in determining your bowl fate.

    MichState04

  • MichState04 said...

    You should care, the outcome of our game plays a role in determining your bowl fate.

    No it doesnt.

    signature image signature image signature image

    ilovetombrady

  • Is it a messed up system? Yes. But it's the system that we deal with. Frankly, I'd rather be in msu's position than ours right now. I'd much rather have a chance to play one game for Roses than sit around and watch other teams determine our fate.

    It will be nice if we can make it to the BCS, but I'll take a New Year's Day (Jan. 2) bowl against an SEC opponent (either Arkansas or Georgia) as well. It will still be a matchup of 2 Top 15 teams most likely, and more importantly, the bowl practices are uber important as Brady continues to build his team.

    As far as msu goes, I saw on another board that the little brother term doesn't really apply, and they're more like Jan Brady. While this is probably even more disrespectful, it's kind of true. Despite the spartans incredible accomplishments (Kudos. Honestly, it's been a great run the last 2 years), they will never be on a level that Michigan is as far as national perception. Is it fair? No. But it's just the way it is.

    Seriously, I think if msu was in the BCS top 10, they still might be passed over, which isn't fair either. They just don't have a big national following that will get butts in the stadium and eyes on the TV. The casual fan won't watch because there is nothing really exciting about msu. They don't have a Denard Robinson who everyone (even non-football fans) have heard of and will tune in to watch. They don't have a great name recognition.

    It's kind of a benefit and a curse. Think about if the Rather Hall incident happened at Michigan...It would have been an ESPN top story. Since it was at msu, there wasn't a lot of publicity for it. In that way, it's kind of a benefit. But as I've said, on the flip side it hurts msu because they will always play 2nd fiddle to Michigan when someone is given a choice between the 2.

    This post was edited by vcmarsh1 on 11/29/2011 at 3:27 PM

    signature image signature image signature image

    vcmarsh1

  • vcmarsh1 said...

    Is it a messed up system? Yes. But it's the system that we deal with. Frankly, I'd rather be in msu's position than ours right now. I'd much rather have a chance to play one game for Roses than sit around and watch other teams determine our fate.

    It will be nice if we can make it to the BCS, but I'll take a New Year's Day (Jan. 2) bowl against an SEC opponent (either Arkansas or Georgia) as well. It will still be a matchup of 2 Top 15 teams most likely, and more importantly, the bowl practices are uber important as Brady continues to build his team.

    As far as msu goes, I saw on another board that the little brother term doesn't really apply, and they're more like Jan Brady. While this is probably even more disrespectful, it's kind of true. Despite the spartans incredible accomplishments (Kudos. Honestly, it's been a great run the last 2 years), they will never be on a level that Michigan is as far as national perception. Is it fair? No. But it's just the way it is.

    Seriously, I think if msu was in the BCS top 10, they still might be passed over, which isn't fair either. They just don't have a big national following that will get butts in the stadium and eyes on the TV. The casual fan won't watch because there is nothing really exciting about msu. They don't have a Denard Robinson who everyone (even non-football fans) have heard of and will tune in to watch. They don't have a great name recognition.

    It's kind of a benefit and a curse. Think about if the Rather Hall incident happened at Michigan...It would have been an ESPN top story. Since it was at msu, there wasn't a lot of publicity for it. In that way, it's kind of a benefit. But as I've said, on the flip side it hurts msu because they will always play 2nd fiddle to Michigan when someone is given a choice between the 2.

    MARSHA MARSHA MARSHA!

    signature image signature image signature image

    ilovetombrady

  • MichState04 said...

    You should care, the outcome of our game plays a role in determining your bowl fate.

    No it doesn't. We'll jump the loser of the CCG and OU or UGA.

    As much as you doNt like it, we will jump MSU if you lose.

    Now go back to tRCMB. We don't carE

    signature image signature image signature image

    Ducksworth

  • vcmarsh1 said...

    Is it a messed up system? Yes. But it's the system that we deal with. Frankly, I'd rather be in msu's position than ours right now. I'd much rather have a chance to play one game for Roses than sit around and watch other teams determine our fate.

    It will be nice if we can make it to the BCS, but I'll take a New Year's Day (Jan. 2) bowl against an SEC opponent (either Arkansas or Georgia) as well. It will still be a matchup of 2 Top 15 teams most likely, and more importantly, the bowl practices are uber important as Brady continues to build his team.

    As far as msu goes, I saw on another board that the little brother term doesn't really apply, and they're more like Jan Brady. While this is probably even more disrespectful, it's kind of true. Despite the spartans incredible accomplishments (Kudos. Honestly, it's been a great run the last 2 years), they will never be on a level that Michigan is as far as national perception. Is it fair? No. But it's just the way it is.

    Seriously, I think if msu was in the BCS top 10, they still might be passed over, which isn't fair either. They just don't have a big national following that will get butts in the stadium and eyes on the TV. The casual fan won't watch because there is nothing really exciting about msu. They don't have a Denard Robinson who everyone (even non-football fans) have heard of and will tune in to watch. They don't have a great name recognition.

    It's kind of a benefit and a curse. Think about if the Rather Hall incident happened at Michigan...It would have been an ESPN top story. Since it was at msu, there wasn't a lot of publicity for it. In that way, it's kind of a benefit. But as I've said, on the flip side it hurts msu because they will always play 2nd fiddle to Michigan when someone is given a choice between the 2.

    lol I remember the Jan Brady comment. Who said that?

    buttesnake

  • Ducksworth said...

    No it doesn't. We'll jump the loser of the CCG and OU or UGA.

    As much as you doNt like it, we will jump MSU if you lose.

    Now go back to tRCMB. We don't carE

    There's a debate about whether OU would drop behind you guys. You're right though, our game doesn't matter to you guys; you'll jump the winner.

    Now, what you don't want to happen is Baylor win big and/or Clemson to beat Va Tech. They could jump ahead of you guys in the pecking order.

    I'd also expect you guys to watch the CCG because a) It's the Big 10, and b) It's probably going to be the most competitive one out of the 4.

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • SpartanRocky said...

    There's a debate about whether OU would drop behind you guys. You're right though, our game doesn't matter to you guys; you'll jump the winner.

    Now, what you don't want to happen is Baylor win big and/or Clemson to beat Va Tech. They could jump ahead of you guys in the pecking order.

    I'd also expect you guys to watch the CCG because a) It's the Big 10, and b) It's probably going to be the most competitive one out of the 4.

    We'll jump the loser (I know, misprint, just pointing it out).

    I plan on watching, first MSU or Wisconsin game I have watched since the MSU/Wisconsin game.

    xxmgobluexx

  • I for one would rather play Houston over Arkansas. Georgia would be nice. Arkansas is similar to Houston in that they would test our pass defense, but Arky has way better talent IMO.

    signature image

    Do infants have as much fun in infancy as adults do in adultery?

    AnthonyBourdain

  • SpartanRocky said...

    There's a debate about whether OU would drop behind you guys. You're right though, our game doesn't matter to you guys; you'll jump the winner.

    Now, what you don't want to happen is Baylor win big and/or Clemson to beat Va Tech. They could jump ahead of you guys in the pecking order.

    I'd also expect you guys to watch the CCG because a) It's the Big 10, and b) It's probably going to be the most competitive one out of the 4.

    1) I'll definitely watch that game.

    2) Don't listen to Valenti.

    y2kMgrad

  • buttesnake said...

    lol I remember the Jan Brady comment. Who said that?

    YAY, it was meeeeeee!

    And by the way, I hate it when you post because i can't stand looking at that picture you have in your signature. It's so disgusting!!!chairshot

    signature image

    unsaddleddonald

  • SpartanRocky said...

    There's a debate about whether OU would drop behind you guys. You're right though, our game doesn't matter to you guys; you'll jump the winner.

    Now, what you don't want to happen is Baylor win big and/or Clemson to beat Va Tech. They could jump ahead of you guys in the pecking order.

    I'd also expect you guys to watch the CCG because a) It's the Big 10, and b) It's probably going to be the most competitive one out of the 4.

    Get outta here rocky. And take your little dog too.

    signature image

    unsaddleddonald