Wolverine247 Board

No. It's a horrible precedent. Bad calls (and non-calls) happen all the time. Several others happened in that game alone. The commissioner's office can't set itself up as a place teams go to appeal bad calls.

I agree with Mr. Woodson no, but I would probably resign, or step down. The league is becoming kind of a joke with all the reviews, what can and can't be reviewed, red flags flying all over, rules changes each and every year. The NFL takes to much time to follow and understand.

I actually didn't think it was such a terrible call. Tate had his arm between the ball and the defenders chest on initial contact so the defender never had full possession, and by the time they both hit the ground they both had two hands on it. At that point its a fight for the ball and Tate wanted it more.

The phantom pass interference call on GB during the previous drive was much more egregious.

As a casual fan of the NFL I actually find the games more entertaining to watch with the replacement refs.

I agree that the officiating in the NBA plays way too big of a role in deciding the outcome of a number of games. The NFL has obviously taken a step backward, but with the return of the regular officials, it shouldn't be anywhere near as bad as it is in the NBA.

It was clearly an interception. The defender had both hands on the ball with the ball pressed against his chest. Which means possession therefore an interception. While Tate had just one hand on the ball. He never had two hands on the ball. He never had any possession. This is not simultaneous possession. This was a big time missed call. I do agree with you on the pass interference penalty, but there were many penalties called wrong in that game. Laslty a casual fan might be fine with these scabs, but for someone that loves the NFL or someone who bets on the NFL they are not ok.