Online Now 509

Wolverine247 Board

The place for discussion on the Michigan Wolverines

On this Board 255
Record: 2671 (1/26/2013)

Online now 421
Record: 7264 (3/12/2012)

Reply

How good was Ohio State this year?

  • unsaddleddonald said...

    I disagree. If there weren't any sanctions, there is no doubt that the national championship would have OSU and Notre Dame. The sanctions are THE reason that OSU isn't ranked #2 in the AP.

    Even though they didn't look incredibly impressive, an undefeated Ohio State will rank higher than a one loss Alabama more often than not.

    Although, I do give props to the national media to giving OSU their 15 minutes of fame after the Michigan game, and then kind of dismissed them until next year. I don't really hear anyone saying "OSU should get a shot".

    clap

    signature image signature image signature image

    SonnyD

  • I think for me it depends on at what point in the season you ask that question. I believe this team was growing down the stretch. Week 12 Bucks would beat week 1 Bucks by 20. So the season being an average, I would say 7-10, final rankings around 4-8.

    Our season this year and your season last year have a lot of similarities. New coach with a bunch of players brought in for a totally different type of system seeming to catch all of the breaks needed to have a magical season. Could have have a much different outcome for both teams but while there is luck involved, you have to have the mental toughness to get through those rough moments.

    By cwoods logic, if a 12-0 team only beats an 8-4 team by 5 at home is only 1-2 points better, an 10-2 team that only beats a 6-6 team at home by 6 points is worse than the 6-6 team. It's a rivalry game, throw everything out. I have many childhood scars from seeing superior talented OSU teams losing to Michigan (cooper).

    buckUBlue

  • psubills62 said...

    Oh Clint, you certainly know how to kick the hornet's nest.

    First of all, I think credit is due the Buckeyes. I didn't watch all their games, but Meyer and his staff had some good gameplans, particularly against PSU. And while they benefited a lot from turnovers, many times you make your own luck. Their offense held them together at the beginning of the season and their defense picked up the slack late.

    That said, they were fortunate to be undefeated. Too many close calls with bad teams (Indiana, Cal come to mind immediately). Cal was how many missed field goals away from a win? I mean, if you won because of some bad kicks by the other team, how much can you say you really outplayed them? Same way for PSU and Virginia. Yeah, PSU lost (4 missed FG's and a missed extra point) but it was obvious who the better team was.

    Honestly, if OSU had played any other truly elite team (Nebraska was not a top 15 team, IMO - PSU should have beaten them), it's likely they would have lost. I'd put them top 10, maybe around 8th or so. Haven't checked the rankings exactly.

    Based on how they played, I think they should have been 10-2. Wisconsin should have beaten them with how well they played. And Cal should have won. Frankly, given how poorly Borges was and how many turnovers OSU got close to the end zone, I'm surprised they didn't beat Michigan by more points.

    In some ways, OSU played well and deserved wins. In others, they didn't. That's just how it goes. I think the AP's hesitancy to put them in the top 2 indicates that others feel that they weren't "undefeated good" either.

    I was feeling a little mischievous psubills. Good post. I agree with what your saying. Credit is due to OSU and like I was saying, I hate to use the word lucky, but the difference could have been OSU's coaching as you alluded to.

    signature image

    Twitter: ClintBrew247 E-Mail: Clint.Brewster@yahoo.com

    Clint Brewster

  • buckeye2280 said...

    We won thats all that matters. We will finish the year no worse then 2 in the AP poll with a very slim chance at #1 if Alabama were to win.

    Secondly you talk about could have lost, thats some shoulda coulda woulda talk that didn't happen. Hell, by your arguement was Florida really that good since they could have lost to LA-Lafayette or Mizz. Townson damn near took out LSU. ND should have lost to Pitt, beat UM only due to arm punt giving up 6 TO's in the first half and beat that same Purdue team by only a FG, a whole 3 points. You can nick pick almost everyones schedule but facts are facts, tOSU won 12 games and Lost 0. This same crap thinking happened in 2002 when tOSU played Miami for the National title and if i remember correctly we finished 14-0 that year.....

    http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1389888-ohio-state-football-projecting-where-buckeyes-would-be-in-the-bcs-rankings

    You're not passing Bama or ND unless Bama absolutely destroys them. I think you'll be behind Oregon and Georgia after the bowl game too.

    thevictor_11

  • bkp1883 said...

    Then we need to beat them for real, and prevent them from embarrassing the B10 in a BCS game.

    huh 6-3 or 2-3. Which record would you take in BCS Bowls?

    signature image signature image signature image

    SonnyD

  • I'd put OSU at #4 in terms of talent. Bama #1, ND #2, Georgia #3, OSU #4, Florida #5, LSU #6.

    I don't think the "OSU almost lost to ____" arguments hold any water when you consider that Alabama DID lose, ND was a fieldgoal away from losing to BYU, Purdue and PITT, Georgia got stomped by USC, Florida almost lost to ULL and was in a dogfight with BGSU, etc. Every team in the country had iffy games, and more than just 1 iffy game, but several. I think Meyer's game plan puts OSU on par with about anyone in the country except Bama and Georgia.

    Personally I feel OSU at the end of the season was a VERY solid team. Not a GREAT team, but very sound for having a FB as starting MLB, a RB who was recruited as a FB, and a WR core that is average at best.

    dukeluke

  • SonnyD said...

    By the end of the year i thought the D was solid and getting better every week after moving Boren(which still blows my mind). Especially with everybody healthy. The offense was unpredictable passing but very solid rushing. I put them at #5.

    Nobody in the big 12, acc, big ten or big east is better. Oregon aint censored if you have 5 weeks to prepare for their offense. Stanford=big time winnable. Bama, ND, Fla and Uga i would say are better but theyd have a shot against all but Bama. Best shot being ND. I hate that we arent playing them in the NCG bc id really like UFM's chances. He's a beast in BCS games

    Also, i dont think the B1G is as awful as everybody states. Top to bottom we match up well with every conference but the sec. Merry Xmas and good luck against Spurrier. I pull for all B1G teams

    Have to add that tOSU was installing a completely new system while they peeled off the wins they needed.....They played Wisconsin and UM at the end of the season--which looks like a tough finish, especially because both were playing their best ball of the year. But tOSU probably loses those two games in late September/early October. We simply improved faster than anyone else in the conference. Meyer is a hell of a coach. Switching Fragel to Right Tackle? He'll be drafted on the first day this year, but wasn't going anywhere as a TE.....Wait til you see what he does with the players HE recruits!

    That being said, I totally agree about pulling for ALL B1G teams. Especially when ESPenis and the rest of the national media are trashing the MidWest's top conference and football talent overall. No more gleeful celebrations of Appalachian State over UM for me. Fun while it lasted, but it hurts the B1G. Any non-conference win for UM is a plus for tOSU and vice-versa. +1.

    Love2H8Blue

  • Clint Brewster said...

    I've been pondering this question since the last game of the season and I apologize if it's already been mentioned here before but I want to see some honest answers here. How good was Ohio State this season honestly? I really think Ohio State is not as good as their undefeated record suggests. Ohio States non-conference schedule was Miami (OH), UCF, Cal, and UAB. They only won against Miami (OH) convincingly and both Cal and UAB had a shot late in the game. In conference play, OSU barely got by MSU, gave up 49 points against Nebraska, went into OT with Purdue, and Illinois even put up 22 points against the Buckeyes. Im just being an unbiased, honest fan here and I really didn't think OSU was anywhere near as good as an undefeated squad should be. Ohio State ended the season 36th in total defense in country, and 48th in total offense. If a few plays go the other way, OSU could have easily lost to UAB, Cal, MSU, Michigan, Purdue and Wisconsin. What's your guys honest opinion?

    Top 10 (6-10).

    signature image signature image signature image

    “Those who stay will be champions” ― Bo Schembechler

    UMRSB

  • We weren't that good. We had some talent but not a lot.

    12-0 was all heart IMO.

    signature image signature image signature image

    TJMMBuckeyes

  • dukeluke said...

    I'd put OSU at #4 in terms of talent. Bama #1, ND #2, Georgia #3, OSU #4, Florida #5, LSU #6.

    You are undoubtedly biased.

    Florida and LSU have more talent than Ohio.

    Btw, I don't think people have realized it yet but Muschamp is stockpiling talent. If Florida's offense improves to match its defense, then UF will be dominant.

    signature image

    Frank C

  • Frank C said...

    You are undoubtedly biased.

    Florida and LSU have more talent than Ohio.

    Btw, I don't think people have realized it yet but Muschamp is stockpiling talent. If Florida's offense improves to match its defense, then UF will be dominant.

    Not to mention Oregon, Stanford, Kansas State and A&M.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Go Blue & Gig Em'!

    TAMUWolverine

  • Frank C said...

    You are undoubtedly biased.

    Florida and LSU have more talent than Ohio.

    Btw, I don't think people have realized it yet but Muschamp is stockpiling talent. If Florida's offense improves to match its defense, then UF will be dominant.

    Florida beat OSU by 7 points last year with Luke Fickell coaching and a rushed kick to avoid the refs overturning a dropped TD pass. Both teams are better this year, but I don't see that tremendous gap in talent you're talking about there.

    dukeluke

  • dukeluke said...

    Florida beat OSU by 7 points last year with Luke Fickell coaching and a rushed kick to avoid the refs overturning a dropped TD pass. Both teams are better this year, but I don't see that tremendous gap in talent you're talking about there.

    They're the only team in the nation to beat 4 top 12 teams, yes they've played down to some of their competition but you have to give them props for the teams they've beaten. OSU went undefeated and they deserve props for that but UF>OSU. Schedules and level of competition don't lie.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Go Blue & Gig Em'!

    TAMUWolverine

  • TAMUWolverine said...

    They're the only team in the nation to beat 4 top 12 teams, yes they've played down to some of their competition but you have to give them props for the teams they've beaten. OSU went undefeated and they deserve props for that but UF>OSU. Schedules and level of competition don't lie.

    I DEFINITELY think that UF is a very talented team. And I do give them credit for the teams they've beaten, but in my opinion outside of the top 2 (Bama and ND), personally I feel the rest of the top 10 are a crapshoot.

    I think it's safe to argue that OSU is #3, and it's safe to argue that OSU is #10, and I wouldn't really disagree with either. I don't feel aside from Bama and ND that there really ARE elite teams this year. Everyone after those 2 I feel has a legitimate argument for the #3 spot, and all 8 (#3-#10) would get blown out by Bama w/Saban having a month to prepare for them.

    This post has been edited 3 times, most recently by dukeluke on 12/22/2012 at 6:10 PM

    dukeluke

  • I would agree with the consensus 7-10 ranking, I do not think UF is head and shoulders above the bucks, I would take Meyer over Muschump in prep and game plan any day. I do not think OSU would be able to keep up with bama or oregon; ND, KSU,TAMU, and LSU would be tough but the bucks would have a chance in those games. I'm not sure about UGA, they tend to blow games like Va tech and clemson do. As far as schedule is concerned it worked in our favor, but you can not hold that against them too much, schedules are usually determined 5 or more years in advance; give them some credit, OSU has played Texas, USC, and Miami in the past 7 years, and have future deals with Oregon, Texas, Va tech, Oklahoma, and TCU. That being said at least they don't pull the same charades that Wisky pulls when their OOC sched has 2 FCS schools and 2 directional schools in the line up. This team should continue to grow next year, they return a lot of starters, should be interesting to see how they handle the pressure and expectations following this year.

    bgdawg87

  • I believe you have to be good and lucky to go 12-0. Look at 2002 for OSU. They were very lucky in a few game that year but were good enough to win the NC. Notre Dame is having the same kind of year as OSU in 2002.

    signature image signature image signature image

    26 - 21, Urban 1 Hoke 0

    gobucks72

  • We *only* gave up by 38 points to Nebraska lol C'mon, man.

    signature image signature image signature image

    TJMMBuckeyes

  • ps3brandon said...

    I'd say that if we were ranking the top 25 teams regardless of record, Michigan wouldn't even be in the top 25.

    This thread has nothing to do with Michigan's ranking. thumbsup Glad this thread got you butthurt though.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Go Blue & Gig Em'!

    TAMUWolverine

  • ps3brandon said...

    I'd say that if we were ranking the top 25 teams regardless of record, Michigan wouldn't even be in the top 25.

    I'd have Michigan around 15... they did play 2 undefeated teams to a 1 possession game on their fields. Nebraska obviously had strange circumstances, and they weren't ready for Bama week 1.

    thevictor_11

  • CMXI said...

    Frankly, if the Buckeyes were as good as a 12-0 record would normally imply, they should've beaten us by a lot more than 5.

    This logic would imply that ND is also an overrated team at 12-0. They beat you by 7. So if they were as good as a 12-0 team, they'd have beat you by more than 7. Right?

    foubazzi

  • foubazzi said...

    This logic would imply that ND is also an overrated team at 12-0. They beat you by 7. So if they were as good as a 12-0 team, they'd have beat you by more than 7. Right?

    ND is overrated. If you can't see that now, wait for the BCSCG. It's going to be ugly.

    This post was edited by MrWoodson on 12/23/2012 at 12:34 AM

    MrWoodson

  • ps3brandon said...

    Love how the mods like to delete every post that isn't pro Michigan.. If one bad thing is said it gets deleted... Just another reason this board sucks.

    If it sucks, wtf are you here?

    MrWoodson

  • Clint Brewster said...

    I've been pondering this question since the last game of the season and I apologize if it's already been mentioned here before but I want to see some honest answers here. How good was Ohio State this season honestly? I really think Ohio State is not as good as their undefeated record suggests. Ohio States non-conference schedule was Miami (OH), UCF, Cal, and UAB. They only won against Miami (OH) convincingly and both Cal and UAB had a shot late in the game. In conference play, OSU barely got by MSU, gave up 49 points against Nebraska, went into OT with Purdue, and Illinois even put up 22 points against the Buckeyes. Im just being an unbiased, honest fan here and I really didn't think OSU was anywhere near as good as an undefeated squad should be. Ohio State ended the season 36th in total defense in country, and 48th in total offense. If a few plays go the other way, OSU could have easily lost to UAB, Cal, MSU, Michigan, Purdue and Wisconsin. What's your guys honest opinion?

    Clint, you're obviously not so bright...first off, if you're going to poke the tiger, at least get your facts straight....We gave up 38 points Nebraska and the game was way out of reach in the 4th quarter...the Defense improved steadily from the start of the year and considering the team was inheriting a new system, a new coaching staff and sanctions, the had a great year. Also, since you're obviously a basketball guy, not a football guy, a team that goes 12-0, is not lucky. Good teams win some close games, great teams win them all. Our coach was quite candid, we were a work in progress most of the year. We all know that, but our score with TTUN, should of been much worse. Next year, look out. It was sad to see Michigan slide so far back in Hoke's second year, I don't expect that to happen in Urban's second year. Clint, as a basketball guy, you wouldn't know anything about Urban, but in his second year in every school he has coached, it has been his best year ever at each program, once his "system" was installed and kids bought into his system. You say you are being honest and unbiased, but to say "I really don't think OSU was anywhere near as good as an undefeated squad should be" shows your basketball intelligence.....You obviously have never played nor watched much football. See, it's very hard to win them all as bad breaks happen to every team. Great teams over come and find ways to win them all. When was Michigan's last undefeated team? So enjoy your excellent Michigan basketball team, but please, keep your critiques of OSU football to those who actually watch and understand the game. You don't qualify for that.

    signature image

    buckfanoutwest

  • buckfanoutwest said...

    Clint, you're obviously not so bright...first off, if you're going to poke the tiger, at least get your facts straight....We gave up 38 points Nebraska and the game was way out of reach in the 4th quarter...the Defense improved steadily from the start of the year and considering the team was inheriting a new system, a new coaching staff and sanctions, the had a great year. Also, since you're obviously a basketball guy, not a football guy, a team that goes 12-0, is not lucky. Good teams win some close games, great teams win them all. Our coach was quite candid, we were a work in progress most of the year. We all know that, but our score with TTUN, should of been much worse. Next year, look out. It was sad to see Michigan slide so far back in Hoke's second year, I don't expect that to happen in Urban's second year. Clint, as a basketball guy, you wouldn't know anything about Urban, but in his second year in every school he has coached, it has been his best year ever at each program, once his "system" was installed and kids bought into his system. You say you are being honest and unbiased, but to say "I really don't think OSU was anywhere near as good as an undefeated squad should be" shows your basketball intelligence.....You obviously have never played nor watched much football. See, it's very hard to win them all as bad breaks happen to every team. Great teams over come and find ways to win them all. When was Michigan's last undefeated team? So enjoy your excellent Michigan basketball team, but please, keep your critiques of OSU football to those who actually watch and understand the game. You don't qualify for that.

    Stop. You gave up 49 points to Indiana. Yes, Indiana. Elite teams don't give up 49 points to Indiana unless it's in basketball. Even our RR teams never gave up 49 points to Indiana and those teams literally had the worst defenses in UM football history. You were a good team this year with a lot of flaws. And you were lucky to play a very easy schedule. Period. That's it. Accept it and move on.

    This post was edited by MrWoodson on 12/23/2012 at 6:46 AM

    MrWoodson

  • buckfanoutwest said...

    Clint, you're obviously not so bright...first off, if you're going to poke the tiger, at least get your facts straight....We gave up 38 points Nebraska and the game was way out of reach in the 4th quarter...the Defense improved steadily from the start of the year and considering the team was inheriting a new system, a new coaching staff and sanctions, the had a great year. Also, since you're obviously a basketball guy, not a football guy, a team that goes 12-0, is not lucky. Good teams win some close games, great teams win them all. Our coach was quite candid, we were a work in progress most of the year. We all know that, but our score with TTUN, should of been much worse. Next year, look out. It was sad to see Michigan slide so far back in Hoke's second year, I don't expect that to happen in Urban's second year. Clint, as a basketball guy, you wouldn't know anything about Urban, but in his second year in every school he has coached, it has been his best year ever at each program, once his "system" was installed and kids bought into his system. You say you are being honest and unbiased, but to say "I really don't think OSU was anywhere near as good as an undefeated squad should be" shows your basketball intelligence.....You obviously have never played nor watched much football. See, it's very hard to win them all as bad breaks happen to every team. Great teams over come and find ways to win them all. When was Michigan's last undefeated team? So enjoy your excellent Michigan basketball team, but please, keep your critiques of OSU football to those who actually watch and understand the game. You don't qualify for that.

    I trust Clint's opinion a lot more than yours, you know since he is the son of a previous HC of a Big Ten school and actually played on the Division 1 level.

    signature image signature image

    Go Blue and Go Titans!

    CorchBlue