-
MaizeandBlue21
- 4 stars Rating: 79
7427 votes total - (16201)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
xxmgobluexx ●
- 4 stars Rating: 78
8519 votes total - (16735)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
CorchBlue
- 5 stars Rating: 89
4804 votes total - King Wolverine247 Mod
- (14184)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
TheDudeAbides21
- 3 stars Rating: 55
1003 votes total - (1254)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
MaizeandBlue21
- 4 stars Rating: 79
7427 votes total - (16201)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
WillyWolverine ●
- 5 stars Rating: 96
3790 votes total - (9047)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
MaizeandBlue21
- 4 stars Rating: 79
7427 votes total - (16201)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
CorchBlue
- 5 stars Rating: 89
4804 votes total - King Wolverine247 Mod
- (14184)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
WillyWolverine ●
- 5 stars Rating: 96
3790 votes total - (9047)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
blue2468 said...
Exactly, why toss one under the bus when you can have both?
Denard has been the heart and soul of our team, whether its on or off the field, and its disgusting to watch so many people just trash him cause they like someone else.
This post was edited by freshone on 11/20/2012 at 2:35 PM
-
MaizeandBlue21
- 4 stars Rating: 79
7427 votes total - (16201)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
maize&blue21 said...
That's because you refuse to believe a QB can be more successful than Denard can and it's extremely annoying. You refuse to give credit to Devin for killing it these last 3 games because it was against sub par competition. After which you demean Devin's stats, you turn around and praise Denard's inflated stats against the same competition.
Yeah, Devin hasn't faced good defenses, but Denard has and proved he is not very successful because he can't make the throws needed to be successful.
WillyWolverine ●
- 5 stars Rating: 96
3790 votes total - (9047)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
WillyWolverine said...
See now why the shot at Denard? Denard was the reason we went to a bowl game in RR's last season. He was the offense and we had no defense what so ever.
Denard was a big part of an 11 win team. If you watched the MSU game there is no way you can put that game on Denard. That MSU game last year was on the whole offense including Denard but not on Denard only. You can't put the Bama game on Denard. You can't put this year's Nebraska game on Denard. The only game you can put on Denard that we lost is the Notre Dame game this year. That's 1 game in 3 years. Get over it. Denard has been very successful here at Michigan.
MaizeandBlue21
- 4 stars Rating: 79
7427 votes total - (16201)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
maize&blue21 said...
If Devin plays in the Notre Dame and Nebraska games at the level he is playing at right now, do you think we lose those games? How about last year against MSU and Iowa?
Yes, Devin came into the game last year against MSU and struggled, but how many QBs come into their first true game, after sitting on the bench for 3 quarters, and not taking any snaps with the first team, and succeed?
Fact of the matter is, Michigan runs a pro style offense. Guess who fits that offense better? Devin Gardner.
Denard is great in the spread offense, but Michigan doesn't run the spread offense anymore. Time to let go of the RR years, where Denard was extremely successful, and move on to the present where Devin Gardner has been extremely successful in the time he has started.
WillyWolverine ●
- 5 stars Rating: 96
3790 votes total - (9047)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | Refresh














Gardner >>>> Denard