Wolverine247 Board

I agree that he is as a QB, but Denard is the far superior athlete. Let's try not to post these today, seeing as it is senior day after all and this is the last time he will be playing in the Big House.

This.

Denard is a great player.

I think Devin could be a great QB.

Why lock it?

Devin Gardner has played 3 atrocious defenses and not one with a pulse. Lets save judgement on Denard vs Gardner until Gardner faces a great defense. Then if you want, y'all can trash one of the greatest players in this program.

Gardner's efficiency is incredibly surprising.

Nobody is trashing Denard.

Just making observations and opinions. Gardner gives the best shot to beat OSU next week.

No, you're just blinded by past stats.

No, I just don't throw proven commodities aside when they're banged up or struggling.

You play who gives you the best chance to win.

What gives us the best chance to win is both guys getting snaps at QB. We need Devin for throwing the ball and we need Denard getting snaps at QB to help out the run game.

Ill disagree to an extent. DR has struggled against the good/great D's, and put up video game #'s against anything less. Devin is flat out a better qb in the offense we intend to run. DR is flat out a better overall athlete. What sucks about your post is putting words in the mouth of the OP and assuming he's trashing denard. Nothing bad about being labeled not as good as a qb that is 3-0, had progressed immensely in those 3 games, and just ran for 3 tds and passed for 3 more, all in the offense we will be running in the foreseeable future. You shouldn't get so defensive when someone compliments our starting qb for next year, and hopefully the next 2 games. Our offense should be run exactly as it was today next week and in the bowl game