-
kylebennett7127
- 5 stars Rating: 90
1371 votes total - (3747)
- 14 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
LEXwolverine1
- 5 stars Rating: 94
799 votes total - (1343)
- 16 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
Jack Daniels ●
- 5 stars Rating: 91
939 votes total - (1415)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
Jack Daniels said...
Hate to be a Debbie Downer, but it most likely isn't Westphal or Mone. Tremendous is the one that put us on commit watch last night, but he didn't even know those two were visiting until Sam Webb confirmed it this morning. So it's highly unlikely it's either of those two guys, but you never know. I think it will be the TE from Lapeer, since Tremendous has done multiple interviews with him, but he needs an offer first and I feel that Weishar and Bunting (also Dickerson) are better prospects at this point in time
Steve Lorenz ●
- 5 stars Rating: 96
3005 votes total - (3115)
- 18 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
Jack Daniels ●
- 5 stars Rating: 91
939 votes total - (1415)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
MrWoodson
- 5 stars Rating: 91
22304 votes total - (16101)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
kylebennett7127
- 5 stars Rating: 90
1371 votes total - (3747)
- 14 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
CMXI said...
Alright boys, get out of the way and let the logical mind that scored in the 99th percentile on his LSAT break this down.
"Hate to be a Debbie Downer, but it most likely isn't Westphal or Mone."
If this were wrong, then we can assume that it is one of either Westphal or Mone. Unfortunately, that would also mean the following statement "So it's highly unlikely it's either of those two guys, but you never know." is also wrong, since it isn't "highly unlikely" that it's one of those two guys.
"Tremendous is the one that put us on commit watch last night, but he didn't even know those two were visiting until Sam Webb confirmed it this morning."
This is much more promising. Tremendous clearly put us on commit watch, so it's possible that the wrong statement is that he didn't know those two were visiting. Unfortunately, if this is the wrong statement, then it means that the "it most likely isn't Westphal or Mone" statement is correct, so although this fits logically, it isn't the outcome I want.
"I think it will be the TE from Lapeer, since Tremendous has done multiple interviews with him, but he needs an offer first and I feel that Weishar and Bunting (also Dickerson) are better prospects at this point in time"
Finally, we have this statement. While there are multiple parts that could be wrong and not change the overall meaning (i.e. Weishar and Bunting being better prospects), I think this is the most likely candidate for the "wrong" statement, since if this is wrong, it doesn't logically affect any of the other statements, and all it means is that the Lapeer TE won't be the commit.
Of course, if we go by Occam's Razor, then we can conclude that I'm just way overthinking this, so we should all just wait until Monday to see what the weekend brings.
Ducksworth ●
- 5 stars Rating: 92
9588 votes total - Wolverine247 Moderator
- (16166)
- 26 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
Dizzo said...
I have been looking over the list of visitors again and none of them really make sense to me as a commit this weekend.
- We are in good position with Damon Webb and Parrker Westphal, and there is a long way to go on kids like Peppers and Blanding, so don't see the coaches pushing for a 2014 DB to commit (unless it's one of the first two, which is unlikely). - In another article recently, a WR prospect said the coaches are waiting to see what happens before offering more WRs because they are taking a limited number in 2014. We are in play for Corey Holmes, we just took DaMario Jones, and Treadwell is still a possibility, so I don't see Kief or other WRs visiting to get pushed to commit this early. - The coaches are being very selective about QBs, so would Andrew Ford even get offered this weekend? - Ian Bunting doesn't have an offer yet and is making his first visit to Michigan, which doesn't seem like a likely commit scenario. - Daniel Cage is the most interesting prospect on the list for me since he camped at Michigan so it's not his first time on campus, but he doesn't have an offer and the coaches are not likely to fill the DL positions with kids like Malik and Bryan Mone still out there with interest.
If it's not a surprise top prospect like Westphal, I wonder if this is a case of a kid saying he might commit if he's offered, but isn't in line for an offer?
-
CMXI said...
Alright boys, get out of the way and let the logical mind that scored in the 99th percentile on his LSAT break this down.
"Hate to be a Debbie Downer, but it most likely isn't Westphal or Mone."
If this were wrong, then we can assume that it is one of either Westphal or Mone. Unfortunately, that would also mean the following statement "So it's highly unlikely it's either of those two guys, but you never know." is also wrong, since it isn't "highly unlikely" that it's one of those two guys.
"Tremendous is the one that put us on commit watch last night, but he didn't even know those two were visiting until Sam Webb confirmed it this morning."
This is much more promising. Tremendous clearly put us on commit watch, so it's possible that the wrong statement is that he didn't know those two were visiting. Unfortunately, if this is the wrong statement, then it means that the "it most likely isn't Westphal or Mone" statement is correct, so although this fits logically, it isn't the outcome I want.
"I think it will be the TE from Lapeer, since Tremendous has done multiple interviews with him, but he needs an offer first and I feel that Weishar and Bunting (also Dickerson) are better prospects at this point in time"
Finally, we have this statement. While there are multiple parts that could be wrong and not change the overall meaning (i.e. Weishar and Bunting being better prospects), I think this is the most likely candidate for the "wrong" statement, since if this is wrong, it doesn't logically affect any of the other statements, and all it means is that the Lapeer TE won't be the commit.
Of course, if we go by Occam's Razor, then we can conclude that I'm just way overthinking this, so we should all just wait until Monday to see what the weekend brings.
say what? Aces High
- 4 stars Rating: 67
2506 votes total - Sam Rothstein
- (2721)
- 8 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
CMXI said...
Alright boys, get out of the way and let the logical mind that scored in the 99th percentile on his LSAT break this down.
"Tremendous is the one that put us on commit watch last night, but he didn't even know those two were visiting until Sam Webb confirmed it this morning."
This is much more promising. Tremendous clearly put us on commit watch, so it's possible that the wrong statement is that he didn't know those two were visiting. Unfortunately, if this is the wrong statement, then it means that the "it most likely isn't Westphal or Mone" statement is correct, so although this fits logically, it isn't the outcome I want.
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
Commit watch