Online Now 1146

Wolverine247 Board

The place for discussion on the Michigan Wolverines

On this Board 710
Record: 2671 (1/26/2013)

Online now 996
Record: 7264 (3/12/2012)

Reply

Bama LS rated??

  • I'm not one to complain but it only took an hour before the newest Bama LS to get a rating. We have been waiting a week now?

    I was ok with it when I got the answer that LS wont get a rating until I see this. I also notice that Auburn has a Punter rated an 80? A punter is on the field even less than an LS. Something should be done.

    Edit: Informed he was rated already. Still waiting on ours though.

    This post was edited by on 6/14/2012 at 2:03 PM

    Scooter305

  • It's gonna be ok. They just got the top LS in the country. We have the second. Both are going to be solid players who we'll hopefully never hear from again unless they decide to make a miraculous catch in a Sugar Bowl.

    Sypniewski probably won't be rated and I couldn't care less.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Ducksworth

  • Ducksworth said...

    It's gonna be ok. They just got the top LS in the country. We have the second. Both are going to be solid players who we'll hopefully never hear from again unless they decide to make a miraculous catch in a Sugar Bowl.

    Sypniewski probably won't be rated and I couldn't care less.

    Still, the fact that theirs' gets rated in an hour while Michigan's has yet to be rated for a week says something to me.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Damaged goods

    MaizeandBlue21

  • maize&blue21 said...

    Still, the fact that theirs' gets rated in an hour while Michigan's has yet to be rated for a week says something to me.

    Yea, this site makes a lot more money off of Bama fans.

    UMPat

  • maize&blue21 said...

    Still, the fact that theirs' gets rated in an hour while Michigan's has yet to be rated for a week says something to me.

    Pretty sure he was rated before he committed, but I'm not positive.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Ducksworth

  • Ducksworth said...

    Pretty sure he was rated before he committed, but I'm not positive.

    How much of a difference is there between the #1 overall LS and the #2 overall LS that one should get rated over the other.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Damaged goods

    MaizeandBlue21

  • maize&blue21 said...

    How much of a difference is there between the #1 overall LS and the #2 overall LS that one should get rated over the other.

    He might get rated, who knows, let be a little patient here.

    But Alabama's LS was rated on May 15th, four days after committing to UCLA, not an hour after committing to Alabama so the entire point of this thread is not even factual.

    signature image signature image

    Go Blue and Go Titans!

    CorchBlue

  • Nonissue, save the outrage for something that matters

    signature image signature image signature image

    BennyG34

  • panic

    www.neoavatara.com/blog

    neoavatara

  • It's just how things are sometimes. It took them several weeks to rate the one OT who committed to us. I believe they wanted to see him in person at a camp, and he had been planning on going to one but cancelled later due to a family commitment. Thus, they just ended up giving him a rating that I believe is flexible until they see him in person.

    Also, I could be confused on this, but I think that LS was previously committed to UCLA, so he was already technically on the radar.

    This post was edited by psubills62 on 6/14/2012 at 3:22 PM

    signature image

    psubills62

  • Additionally, Bama has an unrated OT that committed four days ago.

    buttesnake

  • buttesnake●...............Thank you.

    JHATL41892

  • maize&blue21 said...

    Still, the fact that theirs' gets rated in an hour while Michigan's has yet to be rated for a week says something to me.

    You are correct, 247 and all of the other sites have a SEC bias and refuse to accept talent. The SiriusXM talk show are all SEC biased programs and have complete disregard for what is right. I have writers whom I have the utmost respect for since their desire is to completely factual, honest and accurate in their analysis. But this SEC bias makes me sick and the prognosticators have little if any respect for the truth.

    Mike leach is and was right when he stated the SEC does NOT have the guts to play a post season game in the north, and in fact the SEC is scared to death of playing a B1G team in the post season up north. wussies!

    Maize N Blue