-
Hoke Express ●
- 5 stars Rating: 99
2174 votes total - (2357)
- 16 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
EF_Wolverine ●
- 5 stars Rating: 94
1870 votes total - (1773)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
EF_Wolverine ●
- 5 stars Rating: 94
1870 votes total - (1773)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Clint Brewster ●
- 5 stars Rating: 98
1284 votes total - (4455)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Hoke Express ●
- 5 stars Rating: 99
2174 votes total - (2357)
- 16 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
HelloHeisman 21 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 97
615 votes total - (1452)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
LEXwolverine1 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 94
794 votes total - (1340)
- 16 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
LEXwolverine1 said...
Have a question for everyone. Why haven't we offered Artavis Scott yet? He is crazy good and would fit perfectly into the slot. I have heard i think that the coaches are waiting to get his transcripts. I also saw that the coaches might recruit him on defense. I think that's a bad move considering how many elite DB that have interest and the huge class we are bringing in this year. Any thoughts would be appreciated, have a great weekend!!
Always
-
LEXwolverine1 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 94
794 votes total - (1340)
- 16 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
LEXwolverine1 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 94
794 votes total - (1340)
- 16 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
LEXwolverine1 said...
Have a question for everyone. Why haven't we offered Artavis Scott yet? He is crazy good and would fit perfectly into the slot. I have heard i think that the coaches are waiting to get his transcripts. I also saw that the coaches might recruit him on defense. I think that's a bad move considering how many elite DB that have interest and the huge class we are bringing in this year. Any thoughts would be appreciated, have a great weekend!!
Always
UMFB
- 5 stars Rating: 98
425 votes total - No-Access VIP
- (657)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
UMFB
- 5 stars Rating: 98
425 votes total - No-Access VIP
- (657)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Hoke Express ●
- 5 stars Rating: 99
2174 votes total - (2357)
- 16 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Uncle Newt ●
- 5 stars Rating: 88
618 votes total - (1078)
- 18 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
UMRSB said...
Yes. I have wondered about this one as well. Is it a recruiting tactic, or something else? Personally, I believe the coaches want recruits who are 100% dedicated to UofM. If you cannot say 100% yet, then do not commit. Also, I believe they want to minimize the 'look around' recruits - the ones that commit really early ... then want to take unofficials while committed to you. While Michigan does not have a '14 recruit yet like USC, FL, etc., we may be mitigating future risks by assuring ourselves these kids are committed to UofM.
LEXwolverine1 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 94
794 votes total - (1340)
- 16 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Clarkw267 said...
It was Westphal from what I've heard, and there may be several reasons for it. The main one is, ideally, they would like to see Junior year tape on kids before a commitment, unless it's a sure fire 5 star type kid. It's a time during a kid's HS career where the major changes normally occur, and UM's board could end up being drastically different in a couple months.
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Pages: 1 | ... | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | ... | 797









agreed



just wasn't sure if that was true or not





2014 Recruiting Thread (Updated 06.07.2013)