-
MaizeandBlue21 ●
- 4 stars Rating: 79
7443 votes total - (16226)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
SimplyComplex
- 4 stars Rating: 74
5047 votes total - (13316)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Ducksworth
- 5 stars Rating: 92
9015 votes total - Wolverine247 Moderator
- (15584)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
inuyesta said...
Exactly. Even if the coaches know that we're going to have higher attrition than previously thought and can "afford" to take 25 or 26 in this class, why wouldn't we try to use that extra schollie to try and take another of the elite guys we're in on? Like, we've spent the whole time since Poggi dropped speculating about whether we would go for a 4th WR or two DBs or a SDE...if attrition is really gonna be higher than previously reported, we wouldn't have to make choices about that...until we randomly decided to ink a long-snapper and now we've put ourselves in a bind that wasn't previously there.
I think this is a major blunder, no two ways about it.
-
CMXI said...
Especially with all the hype about this recruiting class. USC is using its limited scholarships perfectly, turning offers into an elite club and forcing all of the best players to secure their spots to ensure not being left out. Michigan has a rare opportunity here to capitalize on having the #1 class in the country - with only 4 spots left, recruits know that they've got a limited window to get in on this amazing class.
Now that we've let a LS take one of those spots, what does it say to Kendall Fuller, Leon McQuay, and all the others? Treadwell may have a guaranteed spot, but did we seriously just kiss our chance at a 4th CB/3rd RB goodbye for a LS? I get that he's supposed to be so good he'll anchor the position for the next 4 years, but this isn't a situation where we're choosing between a LS and a much lower-ranked filler player at the end of a class. This is still early and we're still in on so much elite talent!
Sorry for the rant.
I'll go with it and put my faith in the coaches, but I really, really, really don't like this move. I think, in one fell swoop, this took a lot of the air and excitement out of the hunt for filling up these spots. This really could be the greatest recruiting class Michigan has ever had, and I think we blunted a lot of the momentum around the class with this move.
Ducksworth
- 5 stars Rating: 92
9015 votes total - Wolverine247 Moderator
- (15584)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Frank C
- 5 stars Rating: 95
2441 votes total - Hamuel L. Jackson
- (3241)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Frank C said...
I don't mean to toot my own horn but there's a reason I didn't partake in the Final 4 commits prediction thread. It's because I've been around recruiting long enough to know that there are surprise commits out of left field...like this one.
I just read the following and I'm fine with the commit.
-
Frank C
- 5 stars Rating: 95
2441 votes total - Hamuel L. Jackson
- (3241)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
msucantmakebcs
- 5 stars Rating: 83
1675 votes total - (4008)
- 21 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
inuyesta said...
Out of (genuine, not trying to be snarky) curiosity, can anyone quantify the impact of an elite longsnapper? Like, if you have two teams that are identical in every way except one has an elite longsnapper and the other is just using a backup C or TE or something who trains on special teams, how much better will the elite longsnapping team be...i.e. is the longsnapper worth an extra 5 yards of field position on punts? An extra 10% on FG%?
Ducksworth
- 5 stars Rating: 92
9015 votes total - Wolverine247 Moderator
- (15584)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Jack Daniels ●
- 5 stars Rating: 92
697 votes total - (1118)
- 16 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
buttesnake
- 5 stars Rating: 90
18088 votes total - (27071)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
buttesnake
- 5 stars Rating: 90
18088 votes total - (27071)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
freernnur5 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 93
362 votes total - (1791)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6







...but welcome!



















2013 long-snapper commits to Michigan