-
TAMUWolverine ●
- 5 stars Rating: 88
4537 votes total - (20760)
- 26 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
TAMUWolverine ●
- 5 stars Rating: 88
4537 votes total - (20760)
- 26 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Skip1856 said...
Thanks for clearing that up. It does feel a little bit like Meyer went after too much national talent and left the barn door open in Ohio for this cycle doesn't it? He came in and pulled a coup and snagged 8 commited, or formerly commited players and thought, "hey, this is as easy as I thought it would be", and then let everyone walk around in his backyard this year a bit. Not looking forward to him figuring it out and and trying to rope the state off again.
This post has been edited 3 times, most recently by MrWoodson on 4/11/2012 at 4:06 PM
MrWoodson ●
- 5 stars Rating: 91
20940 votes total - (15160)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
MrWoodson said...
Agree. OSU has plenty of talent already, so it's not the end of the world, but it seems Urbie bought a little too much into his own hype as the rockstar recruiter who can land anyone he wants. He has been circling back with more Ohio/Midwest offers lately but many of the top tier prospects are either already taken or leaning elsewhere. It will be interesting to see how he closes this year. My guess is they will have a top 10 class, but it won't be close to what most OSU fans were predicting just a couple of months ago. And it will be several spots behind ours.
-
buttesnake
- 5 stars Rating: 90
17998 votes total - (26978)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
MrWoodson said...
Agree. OSU has plenty of talent already, so it's not the end of the world, but it seems Urbie bought a little too much into his own hype as the rockstar recruiter who can land anyone he wants. He has been circling back with more Ohio/Midwest offers lately but many of the top tier prospects are either already taken or leaning elsewhere. It will be interesting to see how he closes this year. My guess is they will have a top 10 class, but it won't be close to what most OSU fans were predicting just a couple of months ago. And it will be several spots behind ours.
"The North shall rise again." General Meyer
richardparker10
- 5 stars Rating: 96
260 votes total - (373)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
richardparker10 said...
Hello, gentlemen, its me again.
I've been trying to cut back on my general postings lately but had to throw in my 2 cents on this topic.
I don't think you guys are giving yourselves enough credit by saying Meyer was sleeping at the wheel and that's how you got all these great OL recruits. We offered most of them, and the ones that went to ND for that matter, but you guys won the battles due to some combination of having the ability to get in on them much earlier, historical Michigan ties / fandom and winning some hand to hand combat in the trenches. You could argue the same for Thomas and partially D Smith. On the other hand, I don't think we prioritized a lot of the other offers the way you did, including Gedeon and also the other part of the D Smith loss. Then, of course, there are the guys we didn't offer. I honestly don't think we ever were going to offer them unless they showed the staff something that changed their minds. Some of it was due to prioritizing different skillsets and the other part having different views on skill levels.
Anyways, we've talked about all those issues in the past. I would love to make a purely friendly wager to spice things up on where our respective classes end up for anyone that is interested because I think OSU closes out strong. I think you guys will close out strong, as well, though I think when the dust settles the OSU class will be better. It will be interesting to say the least.
Because there will be be class size differences, I'd propose the following methodology, which I think is fair, but I'm open to ideas. The math would be to examine the higher total team ranking and also the higher average rankings when all is said and done on Scout, 247 and Rivals. So there would be 6 different win/loss criteria. Whoever wins the majority of the criteria would be the ultimate winner. Ties are possible, though we can talk about tie breakers if you're interested.
-
richardparker10 said...
Hello, gentlemen, its me again.
I've been trying to cut back on my general postings lately but had to throw in my 2 cents on this topic.
I don't think you guys are giving yourselves enough credit by saying Meyer was sleeping at the wheel and that's how you got all these great OL recruits. We offered most of them, and the ones that went to ND for that matter, but you guys won the battles due to some combination of having the ability to get in on them much earlier, historical Michigan ties / fandom and winning some hand to hand combat in the trenches. You could argue the same for Thomas and partially D Smith. On the other hand, I don't think we prioritized a lot of the other offers the way you did, including Gedeon and also the other part of the D Smith loss. Then, of course, there are the guys we didn't offer. I honestly don't think we ever were going to offer them unless they showed the staff something that changed their minds. Some of it was due to prioritizing different skillsets and the other part having different views on skill levels.
Anyways, we've talked about all those issues in the past. I would love to make a purely friendly wager to spice things up on where our respective classes end up for anyone that is interested because I think OSU closes out strong. I think you guys will close out strong, as well, though I think when the dust settles the OSU class will be better. It will be interesting to say the least.
Because there will be be class size differences, I'd propose the following methodology, which I think is fair, but I'm open to ideas. The math would be to examine the higher total team ranking and also the higher average rankings when all is said and done on Scout, 247 and Rivals. So there would be 6 different win/loss criteria. Whoever wins the majority of the criteria would be the ultimate winner. Ties are possible, though we can talk about tie breakers if you're interested.
-
richardparker10 said...
Hello, gentlemen, its me again.
I've been trying to cut back on my general postings lately but had to throw in my 2 cents on this topic.
I don't think you guys are giving yourselves enough credit by saying Meyer was sleeping at the wheel and that's how you got all these great OL recruits. We offered most of them, and the ones that went to ND for that matter, but you guys won the battles due to some combination of having the ability to get in on them much earlier, historical Michigan ties / fandom and winning some hand to hand combat in the trenches. You could argue the same for Thomas and partially D Smith. On the other hand, I don't think we prioritized a lot of the other offers the way you did, including Gedeon and also the other part of the D Smith loss. Then, of course, there are the guys we didn't offer. I honestly don't think we ever were going to offer them unless they showed the staff something that changed their minds. Some of it was due to prioritizing different skillsets and the other part having different views on skill levels.
Anyways, we've talked about all those issues in the past. I would love to make a purely friendly wager to spice things up on where our respective classes end up for anyone that is interested because I think OSU closes out strong. I think you guys will close out strong, as well, though I think when the dust settles the OSU class will be better. It will be interesting to say the least.
Because there will be be class size differences, I'd propose the following methodology, which I think is fair, but I'm open to ideas. The math would be to examine the higher total team ranking and also the higher average rankings when all is said and done on Scout, 247 and Rivals. So there would be 6 different win/loss criteria. Whoever wins the majority of the criteria would be the ultimate winner. Ties are possible, though we can talk about tie breakers if you're interested.
HelloHeisman 21 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 97
594 votes total - (1443)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
HelloHeisman 21 said...
Good post for a buckeye haha I honestly don't think ohio is going to finish higher than Michigan this year. Michigan should really close the class out with nothing but 4 stars the way it looks right now. It seems to me like Meyer has made two offers to me the past few weeks I don't know if they are commitable or not(Worley,and Sprinkle). I really hope those guys would commit and take up space in your class because I think they are reaches quite honestly espically this early in the process.
Go Blue Ranger ●
- 5 stars Rating: 94
547 votes total - (1859)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
buttesnake
- 5 stars Rating: 90
17998 votes total - (26978)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
psubills62 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 93
7975 votes total - (14811)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
psubills62 said...
Hard to beat Bama if they do get Nkemdiche AND Foster, in addition to all their other top players. Not to mention...have you seen how many top players Texas already has committed?
UM will definitely be up there, but I wouldn't put money on them being #1.
Ducksworth ●
- 5 stars Rating: 92
8860 votes total - Wolverine247 Moderator
- (15457)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Pages: 1 | ... | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | ... | 612


















2013 Recruiting Hotlist